These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28249001)
1. Accuracy and reproducibility of virtual cutting guides and 3D-navigation for osteotomies of the mandible and maxilla. Bernstein JM; Daly MJ; Chan H; Qiu J; Goldstein D; Muhanna N; de Almeida JR; Irish JC PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173111. PubMed ID: 28249001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A surgical navigated cutting guide for mandibular osteotomies: accuracy and reproducibility of an image-guided mandibular osteotomy. Ter Braak TP; Brouwer de Koning SG; van Alphen MJA; van der Heijden F; Schreuder WH; van Veen RLP; Karakullukcu MB Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 Oct; 15(10):1719-1725. PubMed ID: 32725399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The accuracy of virtual surgical planning in free fibula mandibular reconstruction: comparison of planned and final results. Roser SM; Ramachandra S; Blair H; Grist W; Carlson GW; Christensen AM; Weimer KA; Steed MB J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 68(11):2824-32. PubMed ID: 20828910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Navigation in Complex Osteotomies Improves Accuracy at All Competence Levels: A Study Assessing Accuracy and Reproducibility of Joint-Sparing Bone Cuts. Sternheim A; Kashigar A; Daly M; Chan H; Qiu J; Weersink R; Jaffray D; Irish JC; Ferguson PC; Wunder JS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 May; 100(10):e67. PubMed ID: 29762285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applying computer techniques in maxillofacial reconstruction using a fibula flap: a messenger and an evaluation method. Liu XJ; Gui L; Mao C; Peng X; Yu GY J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):372-7. PubMed ID: 19276828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Surgical reconstruction of maxillary defects using a computer-assisted techniques]. Zhang WB; Yu Y; Wang Y; Liu XJ; Mao C; Guo CB; Yu GY; Peng X Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Feb; 49(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 28202996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Craniosynostosis surgery: workflow based on virtual surgical planning, intraoperative navigation and 3D printed patient-specific guides and templates. García-Mato D; Ochandiano S; García-Sevilla M; Navarro-Cuéllar C; Darriba-Allés JV; García-Leal R; Calvo-Haro JA; Pérez-Mañanes R; Salmerón JI; Pascau J Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):17691. PubMed ID: 31776390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. All-in-one surgical guide: A new method for cranial vault resection and reconstruction. Tel A; Costa F; Sembronio S; Lazzarotto A; Robiony M J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 46(6):967-973. PubMed ID: 29716817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandibular reconstruction with the vascularized fibula flap: comparison of virtual planning surgery and conventional surgery. Wang YY; Zhang HQ; Fan S; Zhang DM; Huang ZQ; Chen WL; Ye JT; Li JS Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 45(11):1400-1405. PubMed ID: 27427546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted preoperative simulation for positioning of plate fixation in Lefort I osteotomy: A case report. Suenaga H; Taniguchi A; Yonenaga K; Hoshi K; Takato T J Formos Med Assoc; 2016 Jun; 115(6):470-4. PubMed ID: 26874372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Replacing cutting guides with an augmented reality-based navigation system: A feasibility study in the maxillofacial region. Pietruski P; Majak M; Świątek-Najwer E; Żuk M; Popek M; Świecka M; Jaworowski J; Mazurek M Int J Med Robot; 2023 Jun; 19(3):e2499. PubMed ID: 36647617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does intraoperative navigation improve the accuracy of mandibular angle osteotomy: Comparison between augmented reality navigation, individualised templates and free-hand techniques. Zhu M; Liu F; Zhou C; Lin L; Zhang Y; Chai G; Xie L; Qi F; Li Q J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Aug; 71(8):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29729839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Supporting mandibular resection with intraoperative navigation utilizing augmented reality technology - A proof of concept study. Pietruski P; Majak M; Światek-Najwer E; Żuk M; Popek M; Mazurek M; Świecka M; Jaworowski J J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 47(6):854-859. PubMed ID: 30914226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A 3D printed cast for minimally invasive transfer of distal radius osteotomy: a cadaver study. Caiti G; Dobbe JGG; Strackee SD; van Doesburg MHM; Strijkers GJ; Streekstra GJ Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2021 Mar; 16(3):505-513. PubMed ID: 33475897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utilization of Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided Preoperative Virtual Planning and Manufacturing in Maxillary and Mandibular Reconstruction with a Microvascular Fibula Flap. Kääriäinen M; Kuuskeri M; Gremoutis G; Kuokkanen H; Miettinen A; Laranne J J Reconstr Microsurg; 2016 Feb; 32(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 26382874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of 3D virtual planning on reconstruction of mandibular and maxillary surgical defects in head and neck oncology. Witjes MJH; Schepers RH; Kraeima J Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Apr; 26(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 29470184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Virtual Surgical Planning in Precise Maxillary Reconstruction With Vascularized Fibular Graft After Tumor Ablation. Wang YY; Fan S; Zhang HQ; Lin ZY; Ye JT; Li JS J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 74(6):1255-64. PubMed ID: 26851316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Achievability of 3D planned bimaxillary osteotomies: maxilla-first versus mandible-first surgery. Liebregts J; Baan F; de Koning M; Ongkosuwito E; Bergé S; Maal T; Xi T Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):9314. PubMed ID: 28839184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]