These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28249093)

  • 1. Exploring Use of the Coordinate Response Measure in a Multitalker Babble Paradigm.
    Humes LE; Kidd GR; Fogerty D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 60(3):741-754. PubMed ID: 28249093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Trivette CP; Williams DA; Watts KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.
    Lee JH; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1700-17. PubMed ID: 22978898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Sequential Sentence Paradigm Using Revised PRESTO Sentence Lists.
    Plotkowski AR; Alexander JM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Sep; 27(8):647-60. PubMed ID: 27564442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The advantage of knowing the talker.
    Souza P; Gehani N; Wright R; McCloy D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):689-700. PubMed ID: 24131605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech.
    Bent T; Buchwald A; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2660-9. PubMed ID: 19894843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD; Ericson MA; Scott KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2527-38. PubMed ID: 11757942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glimpsing Speech in the Presence of Nonsimultaneous Amplitude Modulations From a Competing Talker: Effect of Modulation Rate, Age, and Hearing Loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 59(5):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 27603264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech recognition in multitalker babble using digits, words, and sentences.
    McArdle RA; Wilson RH; Burks CA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Oct; 16(9):726-39; quiz 763-4. PubMed ID: 16515143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Pentony S; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Danish open-set speech corpus for competing-speech studies.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T; Neher T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):407-20. PubMed ID: 24437781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of motion on speech recognition.
    Davis TJ; Grantham DW; Gifford RH
    Hear Res; 2016 Jul; 337():80-8. PubMed ID: 27240478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech production modifications produced by competing talkers, babble, and stationary noise.
    Lu Y; Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3261-75. PubMed ID: 19045809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variability and uncertainty in masking by competing speech.
    Freyman RL; Helfer KS; Balakrishnan U
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):1040-6. PubMed ID: 17348526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Masked sentence recognition assessed at ascending target-to-masker ratios: modest effects of repeating stimuli.
    Buss E; Calandruccio L; Hall JW
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e14-22. PubMed ID: 25329373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.