175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28249629)
1. The 'Real Welfare' scheme: benchmarking welfare outcomes for commercially farmed pigs.
Pandolfi F; Stoddart K; Wainwright N; Kyriazakis I; Edwards SA
Animal; 2017 Oct; 11(10):1816-1824. PubMed ID: 28249629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The "Real Welfare" scheme: Identification of risk and protective factors for welfare outcomes in commercial pig farms in the UK.
Pandolfi F; Kyriazakis I; Stoddart K; Wainwright N; Edwards SA
Prev Vet Med; 2017 Oct; 146():34-43. PubMed ID: 28992926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More tail lesions among undocked than tail docked pigs in a conventional herd.
Lahrmann HP; Busch ME; D'Eath RB; Forkman B; Hansen CF
Animal; 2017 Oct; 11(10):1825-1831. PubMed ID: 28294097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tear staining in pigs: a potential tool for welfare assessment on commercial farms.
Telkänranta H; Marchant JN; Valros A
Animal; 2016 Feb; 10(2):318-25. PubMed ID: 26303891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A survey of straw use and tail biting in Swedish pig farms rearing undocked pigs.
Wallgren T; Westin R; Gunnarsson S
Acta Vet Scand; 2016 Dec; 58(1):84. PubMed ID: 27919291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of pen design on tail biting and tail-directed behaviour of finishing pigs with intact tails.
Brandt P; Hakansson F; Jensen T; Nielsen MBF; Lahrmann HP; Hansen CF; Forkman B
Animal; 2020 May; 14(5):1034-1042. PubMed ID: 31735187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The "Real Welfare" Scheme: Changes in UK Finishing Pig Welfare since the Introduction of Formal Welfare Outcome Assessment.
Pandolfi F; Barber C; Edwards S
Animals (Basel); 2022 Feb; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 35268177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An investigation into the effectiveness of compressed straw blocks in reducing abnormal behaviour in growing pigs.
Haigh A; Yun-Chou J; O'Driscoll K
Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2576-2585. PubMed ID: 31062680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk factors for tail lesions in undocked fattening pigs reared on Swiss farms.
Sell A; Vidondo B; Wechsler B; Burla J; Nathues H
Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd; 2020 Nov; 162(11):683-695. PubMed ID: 33140727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of docking length on the risk of tail biting, tail-directed behaviour, aggression and activity level of growing pigs kept under commercial conditions.
Thodberg K; Herskin MS; Jensen T; Jensen KH
Animal; 2018 Dec; 12(12):2609-2618. PubMed ID: 29573756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Why are most EU pigs tail docked? Economic and ethical analysis of four pig housing and management scenarios in the light of EU legislation and animal welfare outcomes.
D'Eath RB; Niemi JK; Vosough Ahmadi B; Rutherford KM; Ison SH; Turner SP; Anker HT; Jensen T; Busch ME; Jensen KK; Lawrence AB; Sandøe P
Animal; 2016 Apr; 10(4):687-99. PubMed ID: 26522665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can increased dietary fibre level and a single enrichment device reduce the risk of tail biting in undocked growing-finishing pigs in fully slatted systems?
Chou JY; O'Driscoll K; Sandercock DA; D'Eath RB
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0241619. PubMed ID: 33125443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cross-sectional study for predicting tail biting risk in pig farms using classification and regression tree analysis.
Scollo A; Gottardo F; Contiero B; Edwards SA
Prev Vet Med; 2017 Oct; 146():114-120. PubMed ID: 28992915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of tail docking and tail biting on performance and welfare of growing-finishing pigs in a confinement housing system.
Li YZ; Zhang HF; Johnston LJ; Martin W; Peterson JD; Coetzee JF
J Anim Sci; 2017 Nov; 95(11):4835-4845. PubMed ID: 29293713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reducing estimated tail biting risk in German weaner pigs using a management tool.
Grümpel A; Krieter J; Dippel S
Vet J; 2019 Dec; 254():105406. PubMed ID: 31836167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of animal welfare indicators for the on-farm self-assessment of fattening pigs.
Pfeifer M; Eggemann L; Kransmann J; Schmitt AO; Hessel EF
Animal; 2019 Aug; 13(8):1712-1720. PubMed ID: 30630538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in activity and object manipulation before tail damage in finisher pigs as an early detector of tail biting.
Larsen MLV; Andersen HM; Pedersen LJ
Animal; 2019 May; 13(5):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 30324902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The relationship between tail biting in pigs, docking procedure and other management practices.
Hunter EJ; Jones TA; Guise HJ; Penny RH; Hoste S
Vet J; 2001 Jan; 161(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 11145831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of carcass lesions as indicators for on-farm health and welfare of pigs.
van Staaveren N; Doyle B; Manzanilla EG; Calderón Díaz JA; Hanlon A; Boyle LA
J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1528-1536. PubMed ID: 28464078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pig carcass tail lesions: the influence of record keeping through an advisory service and the relationship with farm performance parameters.
van Staaveren N; Teixeira DL; Hanlon A; Boyle LA
Animal; 2017 Jan; 11(1):140-146. PubMed ID: 27306695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
