These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28250433)

  • 21. Facial surface morphology predicts variation in internal skeletal shape.
    Young NM; Sherathiya K; Gutierrez L; Nguyen E; Bekmezian S; Huang JC; Hallgrímsson B; Lee JS; Marcucio RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 27021454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. 3D face recognition using simulated annealing and the surface interpenetration measure.
    Queirolo CC; Silva L; Bellon OR; Segundo MP
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2010 Feb; 32(2):206-19. PubMed ID: 20075453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. 2D and 3D analysis methods of facial asymmetry in comparison.
    Berssenbrügge P; Berlin NF; Kebeck G; Runte C; Jung S; Kleinheinz J; Dirksen D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):e327-34. PubMed ID: 24507934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of a three-dimensional facial scanning system based on structured light techniques.
    Ma L; Xu T; Lin J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Jun; 94(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 19303659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Brain correlates of pro-social personality traits: a voxel-based morphometry study.
    Coutinho JF; Sampaio A; Ferreira M; Soares JM; Gonçalves OF
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2013 Sep; 7(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 23512407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantitative anatomical analysis of facial expression using a 3D motion capture system: Application to cosmetic surgery and facial recognition technology.
    Lee JG; Jung SJ; Lee HJ; Seo JH; Choi YJ; Bae HS; Park JT; Kim HJ
    Clin Anat; 2015 Sep; 28(6):735-44. PubMed ID: 25872024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spatially-dense 3D facial asymmetry assessment in both typical and disordered growth.
    Claes P; Walters M; Vandermeulen D; Clement JG
    J Anat; 2011 Oct; 219(4):444-55. PubMed ID: 21740426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of some problematic factors in facial image identification using a 2D/3D superimposition technique.
    Atsuchi M; Tsuji A; Usumoto Y; Yoshino M; Ikeda N
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2013 Sep; 15(5):244-8. PubMed ID: 23886899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using composite images to assess accuracy in personality attribution to faces.
    Little AC; Perrett DI
    Br J Psychol; 2007 Feb; 98(Pt 1):111-26. PubMed ID: 17319053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Internal facial features are signals of personality and health.
    Kramer RS; Ward R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2273-87. PubMed ID: 20486018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of Gender and Personality on First Impression.
    Mattarozzi K; Todorov A; Marzocchi M; Vicari A; Russo PM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0135529. PubMed ID: 26331610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Depth estimation of face images using the nonlinear least-squares model.
    Sun ZL; Lam KM; Gao QW
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Jan; 22(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 22711771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative analysis of facial morphology between Okinawa Islanders and mainland Japanese using three-dimensional images.
    Miyazato E; Yamaguchi K; Fukase H; Ishida H; Kimura R
    Am J Hum Biol; 2014; 26(4):538-48. PubMed ID: 24838439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital 3-d headforms representative of chinese workers.
    Yu Y; Benson S; Cheng W; Hsiao J; Liu Y; Zhuang Z; Chen W
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jan; 56(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 21917818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A spatially-dense regression study of facial form and tissue depth: towards an interactive tool for craniofacial reconstruction.
    Shrimpton S; Daniels K; de Greef S; Tilotta F; Willems G; Vandermeulen D; Suetens P; Claes P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jan; 234():103-10. PubMed ID: 24378309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of facial soft-tissue profiles based on lateral photographs versus three-dimensional face scans.
    Fink M; Hirschfelder U; Hirschinger V; Schmid M; Spitzl C; Detterbeck A; Hofmann E
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Jan; 78(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 27812721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automatic brain response to facial emotion as a function of implicitly and explicitly measured extraversion.
    Suslow T; Kugel H; Reber H; Bauer J; Dannlowski U; Kersting A; Arolt V; Heindel W; Ohrmann P; Egloff B
    Neuroscience; 2010 Apr; 167(1):111-23. PubMed ID: 20144695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The fractal characteristic of facial anthropometric data for developing PCA fit test panels for youth born in central China.
    Yang L; Wei R; Shen H
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Jan; 14(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 27808657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A novel measurement method for the morphology of the mandibular ramus using homologous modelling.
    Inoue K; Nakano H; Sumida T; Yamada T; Otawa N; Fukuda N; Nakajima Y; Kumamaru W; Mishima K; Kouchi M; Takahashi I; Mori Y
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150062. PubMed ID: 26143939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computational models of facial attractiveness judgments.
    Bronstad PM; Langlois JH; Russell R
    Perception; 2008; 37(1):126-42. PubMed ID: 18399252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.