257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28250458)
1. Accounting for genetic interactions improves modeling of individual quantitative trait phenotypes in yeast.
Forsberg SK; Bloom JS; Sadhu MJ; Kruglyak L; Carlborg Ö
Nat Genet; 2017 Apr; 49(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 28250458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of Epistasis in Natural Traits Using Model Organisms.
Campbell RF; McGrath PT; Paaby AB
Trends Genet; 2018 Nov; 34(11):883-898. PubMed ID: 30166071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A General Model of the Relationship between the Apportionment of Human Genetic Diversity and the Apportionment of Human Phenotypic Diversity.
Edge MD; Rosenberg NA
Hum Biol; 2015 Oct; 87(4):313-337. PubMed ID: 27737590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Epistatic Networks Jointly Influence Phenotypes Related to Metabolic Disease and Gene Expression in Diversity Outbred Mice.
Tyler AL; Ji B; Gatti DM; Munger SC; Churchill GA; Svenson KL; Carter GW
Genetics; 2017 Jun; 206(2):621-639. PubMed ID: 28592500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Replication and explorations of high-order epistasis using a large advanced intercross line pedigree.
Pettersson M; Besnier F; Siegel PB; Carlborg O
PLoS Genet; 2011 Jul; 7(7):e1002180. PubMed ID: 21814519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Epistasis Is a Major Determinant of the Additive Genetic Variance in Mimulus guttatus.
Monnahan PJ; Kelly JK
PLoS Genet; 2015 May; 11(5):e1005201. PubMed ID: 25946702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Epistasis and quantitative traits: using model organisms to study gene-gene interactions.
Mackay TF
Nat Rev Genet; 2014 Jan; 15(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 24296533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of gene interaction on complex trait variation with multilocus models.
Mäki-Tanila A; Hill WG
Genetics; 2014 Sep; 198(1):355-67. PubMed ID: 24990992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial Selection Response due to Polygenic Adaptation from a Multilocus, Multiallelic Genetic Architecture.
Zan Y; Sheng Z; Lillie M; Rönnegård L; Honaker CF; Siegel PB; Carlborg Ö
Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Oct; 34(10):2678-2689. PubMed ID: 28957504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling epistasis in mice and yeast using the proportion of two or more distinct genetic backgrounds: Evidence for "polygenic epistasis".
Rau CD; Gonzales NM; Bloom JS; Park D; Ayroles J; Palmer AA; Lusis AJ; Zaitlen N
PLoS Genet; 2020 Oct; 16(10):e1009165. PubMed ID: 33104702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using known QTLs to detect directional epistatic interactions.
Slatkin M; Kirkpatrick M
Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Feb; 94(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 22353247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phenotypic evolution from genetic polymorphisms in a radial network architecture.
Le Rouzic A; Siegel PB; Carlborg O
BMC Biol; 2007 Nov; 5():50. PubMed ID: 18001473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evolution of pleiotropy: epistatic interaction pattern supports a mechanistic model underlying variation in genotype-phenotype map.
Pavlicev M; Norgard EA; Fawcett GL; Cheverud JM
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2011 Jul; 316(5):371-85. PubMed ID: 21462316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic interactions contribute less than additive effects to quantitative trait variation in yeast.
Bloom JS; Kotenko I; Sadhu MJ; Treusch S; Albert FW; Kruglyak L
Nat Commun; 2015 Nov; 6():8712. PubMed ID: 26537231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Weak Epistasis Generally Stabilizes Phenotypes in a Mouse Intercross.
Tyler AL; Donahue LR; Churchill GA; Carter GW
PLoS Genet; 2016 Feb; 12(2):e1005805. PubMed ID: 26828925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relation between the genetic architecture of quantitative traits and long-term genetic response.
Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Pakdel A; Nejati-Javaremi A; Shahrbabak MM; Ghafouri-Kesbi F
J Appl Genet; 2014 Aug; 55(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 24671636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survival of the Curviest: Noise-Driven Selection for Synergistic Epistasis.
Wilkins JF; McHale PT; Gervin J; Lander AD
PLoS Genet; 2016 Apr; 12(4):e1006003. PubMed ID: 27123867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Epistatic analysis of carcass characteristics in pigs reveals genomic interactions between quantitative trait loci attributable to additive and dominance genetic effects.
Duthie C; Simm G; Doeschl-Wilson A; Kalm E; Knap PW; Roehe R
J Anim Sci; 2010 Jul; 88(7):2219-34. PubMed ID: 20228239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A method for marker-assisted selection based on QTLs with epistatic effects.
Liu P; Zhu J; Lou X; Lu Y
Genetica; 2003 Sep; 119(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 12903749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Directionality of epistasis in a murine intercross population.
Pavlicev M; Le Rouzic A; Cheverud JM; Wagner GP; Hansen TF
Genetics; 2010 Aug; 185(4):1489-505. PubMed ID: 20516493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
