286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28251639)
1. Induction of labour using balloon catheter and prostaglandin gel.
Brown J; Beckmann M
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Feb; 57(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 28251639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MEchanical DIlatation of the Cervix-- in a Scarred uterus (MEDICS): the study protocol of a randomised controlled trial comparing a single cervical catheter balloon and prostaglandin PGE2 for cervical ripening and labour induction following caesarean delivery.
Choo SN; Kanneganti A; Abdul Aziz MNDB; Loh L; Hargreaves C; Gopal V; Biswas A; Chan YH; Ismail IS; Chi C; Mattar C
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e028896. PubMed ID: 31699720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial.
Henry A; Madan A; Reid R; Tracy SK; Austin K; Welsh A; Challis D
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Jan; 13():25. PubMed ID: 23356673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Benthem M; van Beek E; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van Huizen ME; Oudijk MA; Papatsonis DN; Perquin DA; Porath M; van der Post JA; Rijnders RJ; Scheepers HC; Spaanderman ME; van Pampus MG; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW;
Lancet; 2011 Dec; 378(9809):2095-103. PubMed ID: 22030144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
Grange J; Dimet J; Vital M; Le Thuaut A; Ducarme G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Second dose of PGE
Mohr-Sasson A; Schiff E; Sindel O; Suday RR; Kalter-Farber A; Mashiach R; Yinon Y; Dulitzki M; Sivan E; Mazaki-Tovi S
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Sep; 30(17):2074-2077. PubMed ID: 27633399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Du YM; Zhu LY; Cui LN; Jin BH; Ou JL
BJOG; 2017 May; 124(6):891-899. PubMed ID: 27533177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Double-balloon catheter and sequential vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 alone for induction of labor after previous cesarean section.
Kehl S; Weiss C; Wamsler M; Beyer J; Dammer U; Heimrich J; Faschingbauer F; Sütterlin M; Beckmann MW; Schleussner E
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):757-65. PubMed ID: 26437956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Which is the safer method of labor induction for oligohydramnios women? Transcervical double balloon catheter or dinoprostone vaginal insert.
Wang W; Zheng J; Fu J; Zhang X; Ma Q; Yu S; Li M; Hou L
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Nov; 27(17):1805-8. PubMed ID: 24397441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: The MAGPOP randomised controlled trial.
Diguisto C; Le Gouge A; Arthuis C; Winer N; Parant O; Poncelet C; Chauleur C; Hannigsberg J; Ducarme G; Gallot D; Gabriel R; Desbriere R; Beucher G; Faraguet C; Isly H; Rozenberg P; Giraudeau B; Perrotin F;
PLoS Med; 2021 Feb; 18(2):e1003448. PubMed ID: 33571294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Manor Y; Wiznitzer A; Hod M; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retrospective Comparison of PGE
Blair R; Harvey MA; Pudwell J; Bougie O
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 Sep; 42(9):1103-1110. PubMed ID: 32482470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of mode of birth and duration of labour following induction using prostaglandin vaginal gel.
Beckmann M; Gibbons K; Flenady V; Kumar S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Apr; 57(2):168-175. PubMed ID: 28295174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
Du C; Liu Y; Liu Y; Ding H; Zhang R; Tan J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1221-7. PubMed ID: 25408273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of cervical ripening methods for induction of labour: A population-based study using coarsened exact matching.
Blanc-Petitjean P; Carbonne B; Deneux-Tharaux C; Salomé M; Goffinet F; Le Ray C;
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 33(5):313-322. PubMed ID: 31342567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of labour: a comparison between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2).
Kho EM; Sadler L; McCowan L
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 19032662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Induction of labour using prostaglandin E
Beckmann M; Gibbons K; Flenady V; Kumar S
BJOG; 2020 Apr; 127(5):571-579. PubMed ID: 31785056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]