26 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28252207)
1. Development of a patient classification system for critical care nursing based on nursing intensity.
Ko Y; Park B; Lee H; Kim D
Int J Nurs Pract; 2023 Oct; 29(5):e13128. PubMed ID: 36585752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The inter-rater reliability between nurse-assessors clinically assessing infection of chronic wounds using the WUWHS criteria.
Vestjens JJ; Rondas AA; White RR; Holloway SS
Int Wound J; 2018 Feb; 15(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 29076279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Achieving high inter-rater reliability in establishing data labels: a retrospective chart review study.
Wu G; Eastwood C; Sapiro N; Cheligeer C; Southern DA; Quan H; Xu Y
BMJ Open Qual; 2024 Apr; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 38631818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Criterion Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of an Instrument for Assessing the Nursing Intensity in Perioperative Settings.
Rauta S; Salanterä S; Vahlberg T; Junttila K
Nurs Res Pract; 2017; 2017():1048052. PubMed ID: 28798876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the international Burn Injury Database nurse dependency tool with the Safer Nursing Care Tool: Observational study.
Leaver J; Cook R; Dunn K; Dee P; Ejtehadi HD
Int J Nurs Stud Adv; 2021 Nov; 3():100018. PubMed ID: 38746722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nurse Managers' Opinions of Information System Support for Performance Management: A Correlational Study.
Saranto K; Koponen S; Vehko T; Kivekäs E
Methods Inf Med; 2023 Jun; 62(S 01):e63-e72. PubMed ID: 36379471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nursing workload, nurse staffing methodologies and tools: A systematic scoping review and discussion.
Griffiths P; Saville C; Ball J; Jones J; Pattison N; Monks T;
Int J Nurs Stud; 2020 Mar; 103():103487. PubMed ID: 31884330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting patient acuity according to their main problem.
Juvé-Udina ME; Adamuz J; López-Jimenez MM; Tapia-Pérez M; Fabrellas N; Matud-Calvo C; González-Samartino M
J Nurs Manag; 2019 Nov; 27(8):1845-1858. PubMed ID: 31584733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using a new interrater reliability method to test the modified Oulu Patient Classification instrument in home health care.
Flo J; Landmark B; Hatlevik OE; Fagerström L
Nurs Open; 2018 Apr; 5(2):167-175. PubMed ID: 29599992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How the reliability and validity of the patient classification system can be ensured in daily nursing work? A follow-up study.
Junttila JK; Haatainen K; Koivu A; Nykänen P
J Clin Nurs; 2023 Jul; 32(13-14):3720-3729. PubMed ID: 36268660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are nurses' assessments of their workload affected by non-patient factors? An analysis of the RAFAELA system.
Rauhala A; Fagerström L
J Nurs Manag; 2007 Jul; 15(5):490-9. PubMed ID: 17576247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient classification systems used to classify nursing intensity and assess nursing staffing resources in home health care: A scoping review.
Flo J; Landmark B; Tønnessen S; Fagerström L
Int J Nurs Stud; 2019 Nov; 99():103361. PubMed ID: 31509778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of nursing intensity data: inter-rater reliability of the patient classification after two decades in clinical use.
Liljamo P; Kinnunen UM; Ohtonen P; Saranto K
J Adv Nurs; 2017 Sep; 73(9):2248-2259. PubMed ID: 28252207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of nursing management and utilization of nursing resources with the RAFAELA patient classification system--case study from the general wards of one central hospital.
Rainio AK; Ohinmaa AE
J Clin Nurs; 2005 Jul; 14(6):674-84. PubMed ID: 15946275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determining optimal nursing intensity: the RAFAELA method.
Rauhala A; Fagerström L
J Adv Nurs; 2004 Feb; 45(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 14756829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
