BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28252409)

  • 1. A SSVEP-BCI Setup Based on Depth-of-Field.
    Cotrina A; Benevides AB; Castillo-Garcia J; Benevides AB; Rojas-Vigo D; Ferreira A; Bastos-Filho TF
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Jul; 25(7):1047-1057. PubMed ID: 28252409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Online Brain-Computer Interface Based on SSVEPs Measured From Non-Hair-Bearing Areas.
    Wang YT; Nakanishi M; Wang Y; Wei CS; Cheng CK; Jung TP
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Jan; 25(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 27254871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A multi-command SSVEP-based BCI system based on single flickering frequency half-field steady-state visual stimulation.
    Punsawad Y; Wongsawat Y
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Jun; 55(6):965-977. PubMed ID: 27651060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SSVEP-based brain-computer interfaces using FSK-modulated visual stimuli.
    Kimura Y; Tanaka T; Higashi H; Morikawa N
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Oct; 60(10):2831-8. PubMed ID: 23739780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unsupervised frequency-recognition method of SSVEPs using a filter bank implementation of binary subband CCA.
    Rabiul Islam M; Khademul Islam Molla M; Nakanishi M; Tanaka T
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Apr; 14(2):026007. PubMed ID: 28071599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of high-frequency steady-state visual evoked potentials from below-the-hairline areas for a brain-computer interface based on Depth-of-Field.
    Floriano A; Delisle-Rodriguez D; Diez PF; Bastos-Filho TF
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Feb; 184():105271. PubMed ID: 31881401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mental fatigue in central-field and peripheral-field steady-state visually evoked potential and its effects on event-related potential responses.
    Lee MH; Williamson J; Lee YE; Lee SW
    Neuroreport; 2018 Oct; 29(15):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 30102642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial decoupling of targets and flashing stimuli for visual brain-computer interfaces.
    Waytowich NR; Krusienski DJ
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Jun; 12(3):036006. PubMed ID: 25875047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of three brain-computer interfaces based on event-related desynchronization, steady state visual evoked potentials, or a hybrid approach using both signals.
    Brunner C; Allison BZ; Altstätter C; Neuper C
    J Neural Eng; 2011 Apr; 8(2):025010. PubMed ID: 21436538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Plug&Play Brain-Computer Interfaces for effective Active and Assisted Living control.
    Mora N; De Munari I; Ciampolini P; Del R Millán J
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Aug; 55(8):1339-1352. PubMed ID: 27858227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Filter bank canonical correlation analysis for implementing a high-speed SSVEP-based brain-computer interface.
    Chen X; Wang Y; Gao S; Jung TP; Gao X
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Aug; 12(4):046008. PubMed ID: 26035476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Visual Stimuli for Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces in Virtual Reality Environment in terms of Classification Accuracy and Visual Comfort.
    Choi KM; Park S; Im CH
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2019; 2019():9680697. PubMed ID: 31354804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of higher frequency on the classification of steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Won DO; Hwang HJ; Dähne S; Müller KR; Lee SW
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016014. PubMed ID: 26695712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploration of User's Mental State Changes during Performing Brain-Computer Interface.
    Ko LW; Chikara RK; Lee YC; Lin WC
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 32503162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Customized stimulation enhances performance of independent binary SSVEP-BCIs.
    Lopez-Gordo MA; Prieto A; Pelayo F; Morillas C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Jan; 122(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 20573542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-command SSVEP-based BCI system via single flickering frequency half-field stimulation pattern.
    Punsawad Y; Wongsawat Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():1101-4. PubMed ID: 22254506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new dual-frequency stimulation method to increase the number of visual stimuli for multi-class SSVEP-based brain-computer interface (BCI).
    Hwang HJ; Hwan Kim D; Han CH; Im CH
    Brain Res; 2013 Jun; 1515():66-77. PubMed ID: 23587933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utilizing Retinotopic Mapping for a Multi-Target SSVEP BCI With a Single Flicker Frequency.
    Maye A; Zhang D; Engel AK
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Jul; 25(7):1026-1036. PubMed ID: 28459691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Idle-State Detection Algorithm for SSVEP-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces Using a Maximum Evoked Response Spatial Filter.
    Zhang D; Huang B; Wu W; Li S
    Int J Neural Syst; 2015 Nov; 25(7):1550030. PubMed ID: 26246229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency recognition based on canonical correlation analysis for SSVEP-based BCIs.
    Lin Z; Zhang C; Wu W; Gao X
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jun; 54(6 Pt 2):1172-6. PubMed ID: 17549911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.