These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28252801)

  • 41. Eyes on the bodies: an eye tracking study on deployment of visual attention among females with body dissatisfaction.
    Gao X; Deng X; Yang J; Liang S; Liu J; Chen H
    Eat Behav; 2014 Dec; 15(4):540-9. PubMed ID: 25173688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Risk for eating disorders modulates interpretation bias in a semantic priming task.
    Misener K; Libben M
    Body Image; 2017 Jun; 21():103-106. PubMed ID: 28432966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Spatial anticipatory attentional bias for threat: Reliable individual differences with RT-based online measurement.
    Gladwin TE; Vink M
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 May; 81():102930. PubMed ID: 32305660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cognitive processing of body and appearance words as a function of thin-ideal internalization and schematic activation.
    Cassin SE; von Ranson KM; Whiteford S
    Body Image; 2008 Sep; 5(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 18586584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An attention and interpretation bias for illness-specific information in chronic fatigue syndrome.
    Hughes AM; Chalder T; Hirsch CR; Moss-Morris R
    Psychol Med; 2017 Apr; 47(5):853-865. PubMed ID: 27894380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Spatiotemporal brain dynamics underlying attentional bias modifications.
    Sallard E; Hartmann L; Ptak R; Spierer L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Aug; 130():29-39. PubMed ID: 29883677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Relevance drives attention: Attentional bias for gain- and loss-related stimuli is driven by delayed disengagement.
    Müller S; Rothermund K; Wentura D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(4):752-63. PubMed ID: 25980956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Food-related attentional bias. Word versus pictorial stimuli and the importance of stimuli calorific value in the dot probe task.
    Freijy T; Mullan B; Sharpe L
    Appetite; 2014 Dec; 83():202-208. PubMed ID: 25193161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Temporal dynamics of spatial attentional biases toward weight-related words among females with weight dissatisfaction.
    Leng X; Yu X; Chen Y; Wang T; Zhao F; Feng C; Feng W
    Biol Psychol; 2024 Jul; 190():108807. PubMed ID: 38703810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Attentional engagement with and disengagement from appearance ideals: Differential associations with body dissatisfaction frequency and duration?
    Dondzilo L; Rodgers RF; Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M; Vartanian LR; Krug I; Preece DA; MacLeod J; MacLeod C
    Body Image; 2024 Mar; 48():101680. PubMed ID: 38301330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Self-control predicts attentional bias assessed by online shopping-related Stroop in high online shopping addiction tendency college students.
    Jiang Z; Zhao X; Li C
    Compr Psychiatry; 2017 May; 75():14-21. PubMed ID: 28284828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Social anxiety and attentional biases: A top-down contribution?
    Boal HL; Christensen BK; Goodhew SC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 28887795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Longevity of attentional bias modification effects for food cues in overweight and obese individuals.
    Kemps E; Tiggemann M; Hollitt S
    Psychol Health; 2016; 31(1):115-29. PubMed ID: 26230456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Facial expression movement enhances the measurement of temporal dynamics of attentional bias in the dot-probe task.
    Caudek C; Ceccarini F; Sica C
    Behav Res Ther; 2017 Aug; 95():58-70. PubMed ID: 28544892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Preferential attentional engagement drives attentional bias to snakes in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Masataka N; Koda H; Atsumi T; Satoh M; Lipp OV
    Sci Rep; 2018 Dec; 8(1):17773. PubMed ID: 30538271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Attentional biases in patients with alcohol dependence: influence of coexisting psychopathology.
    Sinclair JM; Garner M; Pasche SC; Wood TB; Baldwin DS
    Hum Psychopharmacol; 2016 Nov; 31(6):395-401. PubMed ID: 27859665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect of threat on cognitive biases and pain outcomes: An eye-tracking study.
    Todd J; Sharpe L; Colagiuri B; Khatibi A
    Eur J Pain; 2016 Sep; 20(8):1357-68. PubMed ID: 27091543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Attentional engagement, appearance comparisons, and rumination as predictors of body dissatisfaction: Evaluation of a serial mediation model in men.
    Dondzilo L; Mills C; Rodgers RF
    Body Image; 2021 Mar; 36():180-184. PubMed ID: 33338781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Two eating disorder preventive interventions reduce attentional biases in body-dissatisfied university women: A cluster randomized controlled trial.
    Tobin LN; Sears CR; von Ranson KM
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2022 Dec; 90(12):911-924. PubMed ID: 36395030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Approach-avoidance biases to self-harm cues in young people with self-harm.
    Rodrigues R; Mehesz EZ; Lingford-Hughes A; Di Simplicio M
    J Affect Disord; 2023 Nov; 340():435-441. PubMed ID: 37549813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.