These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2825320)
1. Variance estimators for attributable fraction estimates consistent in both large strata and sparse data. Greenland S Stat Med; 1987 Sep; 6(6):701-8. PubMed ID: 2825320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimators of the Mantel-Haenszel variance consistent in both sparse data and large-strata limiting models. Robins J; Breslow N; Greenland S Biometrics; 1986 Jun; 42(2):311-23. PubMed ID: 3741973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attributable risk ratio estimation from matched-pairs case-control data. Kuritz SJ; Landis JR Am J Epidemiol; 1987 Feb; 125(2):324-8. PubMed ID: 3812438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interval estimation of the attributable risk in case-control studies with matched pairs. Lui KJ J Epidemiol Community Health; 2001 Dec; 55(12):885-90. PubMed ID: 11707482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating variances of standardized estimators in case-control studies and sparse data. Greenland S J Chronic Dis; 1986; 39(6):473-7. PubMed ID: 3711254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maximum likelihood estimation of the attributable fraction from logistic models. Greenland S; Drescher K Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):865-72. PubMed ID: 8241375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estrogen replacement therapy II: a prospective study in the relationship to carcinoma and cardiovascular and metabolic problems. Nachtigall LE; Nachtigall RH; Nachtigall RD; Beckman EM Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jul; 54(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 221871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interpretation and estimation of summary ratios under heterogeneity. Greenland S Stat Med; 1982; 1(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 7187095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A review of adjusted estimators of attributable risk. Benichou J Stat Methods Med Res; 2001 Jun; 10(3):195-216. PubMed ID: 11446148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of conditional maximum likelihood estimation of a common odds ratio. Hauck WW Biometrics; 1984 Dec; 40(4):1117-23. PubMed ID: 6534412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increased risk of endometrial carcinoma among users of conjugated estrogens. Ziel HK; Finkle WD N Engl J Med; 1975 Dec; 293(23):1167-70. PubMed ID: 171569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the use of concordant pairs in matched case-control studies. Liang KY; Zeger SL Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1145-56. PubMed ID: 3233251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of a common risk ratio in stratified case-cohort studies. Sato T Stat Med; 1992 Sep; 11(12):1599-605. PubMed ID: 1439363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Small-sample bias of point estimators of the odds ratio from matched sets. Jewell NP Biometrics; 1984 Jun; 40(2):421-35. PubMed ID: 6487726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bias in methods for deriving standardized morbidity ratio and attributable fraction estimates. Greenland S Stat Med; 1984; 3(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 6463450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]