These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28253636)

  • 1. Towards measuring the Speech Transmission Index in fluctuating noise: Accuracy and limitations.
    van Schoonhoven J; Rhebergen KS; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):818. PubMed ID: 28253636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Listening effort and speech intelligibility in listening situations affected by noise and reverberation.
    Rennies J; Schepker H; Holube I; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Nov; 136(5):2642-53. PubMed ID: 25373965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality.
    Steeneken HJ; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Jan; 67(1):318-26. PubMed ID: 7354199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Novel Method for Intelligibility Assessment of Nonlinearly Processed Speech in Spaces Characterized by Long Reverberation Times.
    Kurowski A; Kotus J; Odya P; Kostek B
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 35214543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceived listening effort and speech intelligibility in reverberation and noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Schepker H; Haeder K; Rennies J; Holube I
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):738-747. PubMed ID: 27627181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subjective and objective speech intelligibility investigations in primary school classrooms.
    Astolfi A; Bottalico P; Barbato G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):247-57. PubMed ID: 22280588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors Affecting Acoustics and Speech Intelligibility in the Operating Room: Size Matters.
    McNeer RR; Bennett CL; Horn DB; Dudaryk R
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Jun; 124(6):1978-1985. PubMed ID: 28525511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of acoustical characteristics of mosques in Saudi Arabia.
    Abdou AA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1505-17. PubMed ID: 12656385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Extended Speech Transmission Index: Predicting speech intelligibility in fluctuating noise and reverberant rooms.
    van Schoonhoven J; Rhebergen KS; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Mar; 145(3):1178. PubMed ID: 31067918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of binaural speech intelligibility against noise in rooms.
    Lavandier M; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):387-99. PubMed ID: 20058985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effects of acaoustic adaptation of classrooms on the quality of verbal communication].
    Mikulski W
    Med Pr; 2013; 64(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 23829065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of the influence of reverberation on binaural speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet.
    Rennies J; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 22087928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring the effects of reverberation and noise on sentence intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    George EL; Goverts ST; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1429-39. PubMed ID: 20689027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
    Collin B; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
    Yang W; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech intelligibility prediction in reverberation: Towards an integrated model of speech transmission, spatial unmasking, and binaural de-reverberation.
    Leclère T; Lavandier M; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3335-45. PubMed ID: 26093423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.