These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28253666)

  • 21. Emotionally conditioning the target-speech voice enhances recognition of the target speech under "cocktail-party" listening conditions.
    Lu L; Bao X; Chen J; Qu T; Wu X; Li L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):871-883. PubMed ID: 29473143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.
    Bernstein JG; Iyer N; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):702-13. PubMed ID: 25698005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Masking release effects of a standard and a regional linguistic variety.
    Brouwer S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):EL237. PubMed ID: 28863622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of noise, reverberation and foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' performance of English speech comprehension.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2772. PubMed ID: 27250170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Head movements while recognizing speech arriving from behind.
    Shen Y; Folkerts ML; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):EL108. PubMed ID: 28253640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Psychometric functions for sentence recognition in sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.
    Shen Y; Manzano NK; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3613-24. PubMed ID: 26723318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Children's perception of nonnative-accented sentences in noise and quiet.
    Bent T; Atagi E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3985-93. PubMed ID: 26723352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimates of decision weights and internal noise in the masked discrimination of vowels by young and elderly adults.
    Gilbertson L; Lutfi RA; Lee J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):EL403-7. PubMed ID: 26093447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Pentony S; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. English sentence recognition in speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native listeners.
    Jin SH; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23145700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Target identification using relative level in multi-talker listening.
    Kitterick PT; Clarke E; O'Shea C; Seymour J; Summerfield AQ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2899-909. PubMed ID: 23654395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perception of prosody in normal and whispered French.
    Heeren WF; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):2026-40. PubMed ID: 25235001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of age on speech and voice quality ratings.
    Goy H; Kathleen Pichora-Fuller M; van Lieshout P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1648. PubMed ID: 27106312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Listen to your mother! The role of talker familiarity in infant streaming.
    Barker BA; Newman RS
    Cognition; 2004 Dec; 94(2):B45-53. PubMed ID: 15582622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factors affecting the development of speech recognition in steady and modulated noise.
    Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2964. PubMed ID: 27250187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Informational masking and the effects of differences in fundamental frequency and fundamental-frequency contour on phonetic integration in a formant ensemble.
    Summers RJ; Bailey PJ; Roberts B
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():295-303. PubMed ID: 27815130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.