These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28253785)

  • 1. The Intentions of Letter Writers for Applicants to a Baccalaureate-M.D. Program: Self-Report and Content Analyses of Letters of Reference.
    Mavis BE; Shafer CL; Magallanes BM
    Med Educ Online; 2006 Dec; 11(1):4586. PubMed ID: 28253785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of Gender on Surgical Residency Applicants' Recommendation Letters.
    Turrentine FE; Dreisbach CN; St Ivany AR; Hanks JB; Schroen AT
    J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Apr; 228(4):356-365.e3. PubMed ID: 30630084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gendered Language in Letters of Recommendation for Applicants to Pulmonary Critical Care Fellowships.
    Viglianti EM; Sheffield V; Choudhuri I; Goldberg R; Vita A; Byrd KM; Oliverio AL
    ATS Sch; 2022 Oct; 3(3):413-424. PubMed ID: 36312806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Letters of recommendation to an otolaryngology/head and neck surgery residency program: their function and the role of gender.
    Messner AH; Shimahara E
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Aug; 118(8):1335-44. PubMed ID: 18596564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of the 2016-2017 Dermatology Standardized Letter of Recommendation.
    Wang RF; Zhang M; Alloo A; Stasko T; Miller JE; Kaffenberger JA
    J Clin Aesthet Dermatol; 2018 Mar; 11(3):26-29. PubMed ID: 29606997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the experience of the writer affect the evaluative components on the standardized letter of recommendation in emergency medicine?
    Beskind DL; Hiller KM; Stolz U; Bradshaw H; Berkman M; Stoneking LR; Fiorello A; Min A; Viscusi C; Grall KJ
    J Emerg Med; 2014 Apr; 46(4):544-50. PubMed ID: 24113483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Promotion and tenure letters: A guide for faculty.
    Gottlieb M; Chan TM; Yarris LM; Linden JA; Coates WC
    AEM Educ Train; 2022 Jun; 6(3):e10759. PubMed ID: 35707393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Affective Disposition and the Letter of Reference.
    Judge TA; Higgins CA
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1998 Sep; 75(3):207-221. PubMed ID: 9740767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Retrospective Analysis Comparing the New Standardized Letter of Recommendation in Dermatology with the Classic Narrative Letter of Recommendation.
    Kaffenberger JA; Mosser J; Lee G; Pootrakul L; Harfmann K; Fabbro S; Faith EF; Carr D; Plotner A; Zirwas M; Kaffenberger BH
    J Clin Aesthet Dermatol; 2016 Sep; 9(9):36-42. PubMed ID: 27878060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Analysis of characteristics shown in self introduction letter and professor's recommendation letter].
    Kim SH
    Korean J Med Educ; 2013 Sep; 25(3):189-99. PubMed ID: 25804848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A versus F: the effects of implicit letter priming on cognitive performance.
    Ciani KD; Sheldon KM
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2010 Mar; 80(Pt 1):99-119. PubMed ID: 19622200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of the AAOS Leadership Fellows Program for Orthopaedic Surgeons.
    Day CS; Tabrizi S; Kramer J; Yule AC; Ahn BS;
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2700-8. PubMed ID: 21084580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attributes of successfully matched versus unmatched obstetrics and gynecology fellowship applicants.
    Iqbal IJ; Sareen P; Shoup B; Muffly T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 210(6):567.e1-8. PubMed ID: 24412118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining personal talents and behavioral styles of applicants to surgical training: a new look at an old problem, part II.
    Bell RM; Fann SA; Morrison JE; Lisk JR
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 22208827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer assessment of outpatient consultation letters--feasibility and satisfaction.
    Keely E; Myers K; Dojeiji S; Campbell C
    BMC Med Educ; 2007 May; 7():13. PubMed ID: 17519024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Letters of recommendation for surgical residencies: what they say and what they mean.
    Greenburg AG; Doyle J; McClure DK
    J Surg Res; 1994 Feb; 56(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 8121177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applicants' opinions about the selection process for oral and maxillofacial surgery programs.
    Marciani RD; Smith TA; Heaton LJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 May; 61(5):608-14. PubMed ID: 12730841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences between good and poor child writers on fMRI contrasts for writing newly taught and highly practiced letter forms.
    Richards TL; Berninger VW; Stock P; Altemeier L; Trivedi P; Maravilla KR
    Read Writ; 2011 May; 24(5):493-516. PubMed ID: 32205916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use and utility of Web-based residency program information: a survey of residency applicants.
    Embi PJ; Desai S; Cooney TG
    J Med Internet Res; 2003; 5(3):e22. PubMed ID: 14517113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behaviorally anchored ranking scale versus letters of recommendation for evaluating residency candidates.
    Doutré WH; Buesing AS; Ingrim NB; Guernsey BG; Hokanson JA; Galvan E
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1984 Nov; 41(11):2367-70. PubMed ID: 6507439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.