These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28253858)

  • 1. A hybrid method for the imputation of genomic data in livestock populations.
    Antolín R; Nettelblad C; Gorjanc G; Money D; Hickey JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Mar; 49(1):30. PubMed ID: 28253858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the performance of hidden Markov models for imputation in animal breeding.
    Whalen A; Gorjanc G; Ros-Freixedes R; Hickey JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Sep; 50(1):44. PubMed ID: 30223768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of whole-genome sequence imputation using hybrid peeling in large pedigreed livestock populations.
    Ros-Freixedes R; Whalen A; Chen CY; Gorjanc G; Herring WO; Mileham AJ; Hickey JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Apr; 52(1):17. PubMed ID: 32248811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genotype imputation to increase sample size in pedigreed populations.
    Hickey JM; Cleveland MA; Maltecca C; Gorjanc G; Gredler B; Kranis A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():395-410. PubMed ID: 23756901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of vicinity-based hidden Markov models for genotype imputation.
    Wang S; Kim M; Jiang X; Harmanci AO
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Aug; 23(1):356. PubMed ID: 36038834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A combined long-range phasing and long haplotype imputation method to impute phase for SNP genotypes.
    Hickey JM; Kinghorn BP; Tier B; Wilson JF; Dunstan N; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Mar; 43(1):12. PubMed ID: 21388557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of different methods for imputing genome-wide marker genotypes in Swedish and Finnish Red Cattle.
    Ma P; Brøndum RF; Zhang Q; Lund MS; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jul; 96(7):4666-77. PubMed ID: 23684022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
    Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genotype Imputation To Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Farmed Atlantic Salmon.
    Tsai HY; Matika O; Edwards SM; Antolín-Sánchez R; Hamilton A; Guy DR; Tinch AE; Gharbi K; Stear MJ; Taggart JB; Bron JE; Hickey JM; Houston RD
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Apr; 7(4):1377-1383. PubMed ID: 28250015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating Imputation Algorithms for Low-Depth Genotyping-By-Sequencing (GBS) Data.
    Chan AW; Hamblin MT; Jannink JL
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160733. PubMed ID: 27537694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new approach for efficient genotype imputation using information from relatives.
    Sargolzaei M; Chesnais JP; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):478. PubMed ID: 24935670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the accuracy of imputed sequence variant genotypes and their utility for causal variant detection in cattle.
    Pausch H; MacLeod IM; Fries R; Emmerling R; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Goddard ME
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):24. PubMed ID: 28222685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of measures of correctness of genotype imputation in the context of genomic prediction: a review of livestock applications.
    Calus MP; Bouwman AC; Hickey JM; Veerkamp RF; Mulder HA
    Animal; 2014 Nov; 8(11):1743-53. PubMed ID: 25045914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation.
    Cleveland MA; Hickey JM
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3583-92. PubMed ID: 23736050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving Imputation Quality in BEAGLE for Crop and Livestock Data.
    Pook T; Mayer M; Geibel J; Weigend S; Cavero D; Schoen CC; Simianer H
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Jan; 10(1):177-188. PubMed ID: 31676508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fast and accurate imputation of summary statistics enhances evidence of functional enrichment.
    Pasaniuc B; Zaitlen N; Shi H; Bhatia G; Gusev A; Pickrell J; Hirschhorn J; Strachan DP; Patterson N; Price AL
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Oct; 30(20):2906-14. PubMed ID: 24990607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A heuristic method for fast and accurate phasing and imputation of single-nucleotide polymorphism data in bi-parental plant populations.
    Gonen S; Wimmer V; Gaynor RC; Byrne E; Gorjanc G; Hickey JM
    Theor Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 131(11):2345-2357. PubMed ID: 30078163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa.
    Aliloo H; Mrode R; Okeyo AM; Ni G; Goddard ME; Gibson JP
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):9108-9127. PubMed ID: 30077450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extending long-range phasing and haplotype library imputation methods to impute genotypes on sex chromosomes.
    Hickey JM; Kranis A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Apr; 45(1):10. PubMed ID: 23617460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imputation of non-genotyped individuals based on genotyped relatives: assessing the imputation accuracy of a real case scenario in dairy cattle.
    Bouwman AC; Hickey JM; Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):6. PubMed ID: 24490796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.