BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28254421)

  • 21. Stabilising effect of dynamic interspinous spacers in degenerative low-grade lumbar instability.
    Holinka J; Krepler P; Matzner M; Grohs JG
    Int Orthop; 2011 Mar; 35(3):395-400. PubMed ID: 20419452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long-term outcomes after revision neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the effectiveness of surgery.
    Mendenhall SK; Parker SL; Adogwa O; Shau DN; Cheng J; Aaronson O; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Oct; 27(7):353-7. PubMed ID: 25247253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Distraction Laminoplasty With Interlaminar Lumbar Instrumented Fusion (ILIF) for Lumbar Stenosis With or Without Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis: Technique and 2-Year Outcomes.
    Cuéllar JM; Field JS; Bae HW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S97-S105. PubMed ID: 26839990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Försth P; Ólafsson G; Carlsson T; Frost A; Borgström F; Fritzell P; Öhagen P; Michaëlsson K; Sandén B
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Apr; 374(15):1413-23. PubMed ID: 27074066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Two-year follow-up after decompressive surgery with and without implantation of an interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective controlled study.
    Richter A; Halm HF; Hauck M; Quante M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Aug; 27(6):336-41. PubMed ID: 22643187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficacy and Safety of Full-endoscopic Decompression via Interlaminar Approach for Central or Lateral Recess Spinal Stenosis of the Lumbar Spine: A Meta-analysis.
    Lee CH; Choi M; Ryu DS; Choi I; Kim CH; Kim HS; Sohn MJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Dec; 43(24):1756-1764. PubMed ID: 29794584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Decompression and coflex interlaminar stabilization compared with conventional surgical procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kuang MJ; Ma JX; Ma XL
    Int J Surg; 2017 Sep; 45():164-165. PubMed ID: 28648793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Response: "Decompression and coflex interlaminar stabilization compared with conventional surgical procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis".
    Li AM; Li X; Zhong Y
    Int J Surg; 2017 Sep; 45():166-167. PubMed ID: 28709934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [A comparative study between Coflex interspinous dynamic reconstruction and lumbar 360 degrees fusion in treating single-level degenerative lumbar spinal disorders].
    Liu J; Liu H; Li T; Zeng J; Song Y; Liu L; Gong Q
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 25(6):693-8. PubMed ID: 21735783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interspinous process devices(IPD) alone versus decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis(LSS): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhao XW; Ma JX; Ma XL; Li F; He WW; Jiang X; Wang Y; Han B; Lu B
    Int J Surg; 2017 Mar; 39():57-64. PubMed ID: 28110031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Outcomes and Complications of Surgical Treatment for LSS at 1-Year Follow-up - Prospective Study].
    Ježek J; Waldauf P; Krbec M; Douša P; Skála-Rosenbaum J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2019; 86(4):256-263. PubMed ID: 31524586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Gelalis ID; Arnaoutoglou C; Christoforou G; Lykissas MG; Batsilas I; Xenakis T
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 21088465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression.
    Schöller K; Alimi M; Cong GT; Christos P; Härtl R
    Neurosurgery; 2017 Mar; 80(3):355-367. PubMed ID: 28362963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Decompression with fusion is not in superiority to decompression alone in lumbar stenosis based on randomized controlled trials: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.
    Xu S; Wang J; Liang Y; Zhu Z; Wang K; Qian Y; Liu H
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Nov; 98(46):e17849. PubMed ID: 31725625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Decompression with fusion versus decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chen B; Lv Y; Wang ZC; Guo XC; Chao CZ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Sep; 99(38):e21973. PubMed ID: 32957316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spinal sagittal balance status affects postoperative actual falls and quality of life after decompression and fusion in-situ surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Lee BH; Park JO; Kim HS; Suk KS; Lee SY; Lee HM; Yang JH; Moon SH
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Sep; 148():52-9. PubMed ID: 27398622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes.
    Louie PK; Paul JC; Markowitz J; Bell JA; Basques BA; Yacob A; An HS
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 28456675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Decompression alone vs. decompression plus fusion for claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Thomas K; Faris P; McIntosh G; Manners S; Abraham E; Bailey CS; Paquet J; Cadotte D; Jacobs WB; Rampersaud YR; Manson NA; Hall H; Fisher CG
    Spine J; 2019 Oct; 19(10):1633-1639. PubMed ID: 31195133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.