These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28254452)

  • 1. Neural signatures of adaptive post-error adjustments in visual search.
    Steinhauser R; Maier ME; Steinhauser M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Apr; 150():270-278. PubMed ID: 28254452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early and late selection processes have separable influences on the neural substrates of attention.
    Drisdelle BL; Jolicoeur P
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 May; 127():52-61. PubMed ID: 29524444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Error-related brain activity and adjustments of selective attention following errors.
    Maier ME; Yeung N; Steinhauser M
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(4):2339-47. PubMed ID: 21511043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociation of the N2pc and sustained posterior contralateral negativity in a choice response task.
    Jolicoeur P; Brisson B; Robitaille N
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():160-72. PubMed ID: 18482718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamics of target and distractor processing in visual search: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Hilimire MR; Mounts JR; Parks NA; Corballis PM
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 May; 495(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 21457759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improvement in visual search with practice: mapping learning-related changes in neurocognitive stages of processing.
    Clark K; Appelbaum LG; van den Berg B; Mitroff SR; Woldorff MG
    J Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 35(13):5351-9. PubMed ID: 25834059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid adaptive adjustments of selective attention following errors revealed by the time course of steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Steinhauser M; Andersen SK
    Neuroimage; 2019 Feb; 186():83-92. PubMed ID: 30366075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence.
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2460-2477. PubMed ID: 27734768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus- and Response-locked Posterior Contralateral Negativity Bisect Cognitive Operations in Visual Search.
    Drisdelle BL; Jolicœur P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 31(4):574-591. PubMed ID: 30566367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Error positivity is related to attentional control of task switching.
    Tanaka H
    Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(8):820-4. PubMed ID: 19384255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brain dynamics of attention and working memory engagement in subitizing.
    Pagano S; Lombardi L; Mazza V
    Brain Res; 2014 Jan; 1543():244-52. PubMed ID: 24309139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. You see what you have learned. Evidence for an interrelation of associative learning and visual selective attention.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Uengoer M; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1483-97. PubMed ID: 26338030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. N2pc and attentional capture by colour and orientation-singletons in pure and mixed visual search tasks.
    Rodríguez Holguín S; Doallo S; Vizoso C; Cadaveira F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 19409424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fundamental properties of the N2pc as an index of spatial attention: effects of masking.
    Robitaille N; Jolicoeur P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2006 Jun; 60(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 17133886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The amplitude of N2pc reflects the physical disparity between target item and distracters.
    Zhao G; Liu Q; Zhang Y; Jiao J; Zhang Q; Sun H; Li H
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Mar; 491(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 21215298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attention to features precedes attention to locations in visual search: evidence from electromagnetic brain responses in humans.
    Hopf JM; Boelmans K; Schoenfeld MA; Luck SJ; Heinze HJ
    J Neurosci; 2004 Feb; 24(8):1822-32. PubMed ID: 14985422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "I will fix only my own mistakes": an ERP study investigating error processing in a joint choice-RT task.
    Picton L; Saunders B; Jentzsch I
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):777-85. PubMed ID: 22269931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual search performance is predicted by both prestimulus and poststimulus electrical brain activity.
    van den Berg B; Appelbaum LG; Clark K; Lorist MM; Woldorff MG
    Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():37718. PubMed ID: 27901053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mandatory processing of irrelevant fearful face features in visual search.
    Fenker DB; Heipertz D; Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Noesselt T; Heinze HJ; Duezel E; Hopf JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 22(12):2926-38. PubMed ID: 19702468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feature-guided attentional capture cannot be prevented by spatial filtering.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Apr; 134():1-8. PubMed ID: 29458180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.