204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28254688)
1. Sexual abuse and preschoolers: Forensic details in regard of question types.
Gagnon K; Cyr M
Child Abuse Negl; 2017 May; 67():109-118. PubMed ID: 28254688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of interviewers' supportive comments and children's reluctance to cooperate during sexual abuse disclosure.
Lewy J; Cyr M; Dion J
Child Abuse Negl; 2015 May; 43():112-22. PubMed ID: 25816755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the effectiveness of the NICHD investigative interview protocol when interviewing French-speaking alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Quebec.
Cyr M; Lamb ME
Child Abuse Negl; 2009 May; 33(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 19481261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of the NICHD protocol to enhance the quantity of details obtained from children with low verbal abilities in investigative interviews: a pilot study.
Dion J; Cyr M
J Child Sex Abus; 2008; 17(2):144-62. PubMed ID: 19042243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "Because she's one who listens": children discuss disclosure recipients in forensic interviews.
Malloy LC; Brubacher SP; Lamb ME
Child Maltreat; 2013 Nov; 18(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 23897746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of interviewer gender and child gender on the informativeness of alleged child sexual abuse victims in forensic interviews.
Lamb ME; Garretson ME
Law Hum Behav; 2003 Apr; 27(2):157-71. PubMed ID: 12733419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Age differences in young children's responses to open-ended invitations in the course of forensic interviews.
Lamb ME; Sternberg KJ; Orbach Y; Esplin PW; Stewart H; Mitchell S
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2003 Oct; 71(5):926-34. PubMed ID: 14516241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls.
Lamb ME; Hershkowitz I; Sternberg KJ; Boat B; Everson MD
Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1251-9. PubMed ID: 8985616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The development of communicative and narrative skills among preschoolers: lessons from forensic interviews about child abuse.
Hershkowitz I; Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Katz C; Horowitz D
Child Dev; 2012; 83(2):611-22. PubMed ID: 22181976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developmental differences in the function and use of anatomical dolls during interviews with alleged sexual abuse victims.
Thierry KL; Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Pipe ME
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2005 Dec; 73(6):1125-34. PubMed ID: 16392985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Forensic Interviewers' Difficulty With Invitations: Faux Invitations and Negative Recasting.
Henderson HM; Russo N; Lyon TD
Child Maltreat; 2020 Aug; 25(3):363-372. PubMed ID: 31876172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of intra- versus post-interview feedback during simulated practice interviews about child abuse.
Powell MB; Fisher RP; Hughes-Scholes CH
Child Abuse Negl; 2008 Feb; 32(2):213-27. PubMed ID: 18313750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Eliciting accounts of alleged child sexual abuse: how do children report touch?
Teoh YS; Pipe ME; Johnson ZH; Lamb ME
J Child Sex Abus; 2014; 23(7):792-803. PubMed ID: 25101533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigative interviews of child witnesses in Sweden.
Cederborg AC; Orbach Y; Sternberg KJ; Lamb ME
Child Abuse Negl; 2000 Oct; 24(10):1355-61. PubMed ID: 11075701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of age and delay on responses to repeated questions in forensic interviews with children alleging sexual abuse.
Andrews SJ; Lamb ME
Law Hum Behav; 2014 Apr; 38(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 24341834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Children's disclosures of sexual abuse: learning from direct inquiry.
Schaeffer P; Leventhal JM; Asnes AG
Child Abuse Negl; 2011 May; 35(5):343-52. PubMed ID: 21620161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of multipart prompts on children's testimonies in sexual abuse investigations.
Katz C; Hershkowitz I
Child Abuse Negl; 2012; 36(11-12):753-9. PubMed ID: 23069782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences between accounts provided by witnesses and alleged victims of child sexual abuse.
Lamb ME; Sternberg KJ; Orbach Y; Hershkowitz I; Horowitz D
Child Abuse Negl; 2003 Sep; 27(9):1019-31. PubMed ID: 14550329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Open-ended initial invitations are particularly helpful in eliciting forensically relevant information from child witnesses.
Danby MC; Sharman SJ
Child Abuse Negl; 2023 Dec; 146():106505. PubMed ID: 37844459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Searching for Truth: The Forensic Interviewer's Use of an Assessment Approach While Conducting Child Sexual Abuse Interviews.
Duron JF
J Child Sex Abus; 2020; 29(2):183-204. PubMed ID: 29932818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
