These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28254738)

  • 1. Readability Formulas and User Perceptions of Electronic Health Records Difficulty: A Corpus Study.
    Zheng J; Yu H
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Mar; 19(3):e59. PubMed ID: 28254738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Readability of Patient Education Materials in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R): A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.
    Han A; Carayannopoulos AG
    PM R; 2020 Apr; 12(4):368-373. PubMed ID: 31361388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: application, results, and recommendations.
    Wang LW; Miller MJ; Schmitt MR; Wen FK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2013; 9(5):503-16. PubMed ID: 22835706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.
    Edmunds MR; Barry RJ; Denniston AK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24178035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the Readability of Medical Documents: A Ranking Approach.
    Zheng J; Yu H
    JMIR Med Inform; 2018 Mar; 6(1):e17. PubMed ID: 29572199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A readability assessment of online stroke information.
    Sharma N; Tridimas A; Fitzsimmons PR
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014 Jul; 23(6):1362-7. PubMed ID: 24389374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery.
    Cherla DV; Sanghvi S; Choudhry OJ; Liu JK; Eloy JA
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Aug; 122(8):1649-54. PubMed ID: 22685030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disparities between English and Spanish in readability of online endodontic information for laypeople.
    Miguéns-Vila R; Ledesma-Ludi Y; Rodríguez-Lozano F; Varela-Centelles P; Seoane-Romero JM; Castelo-Baz P
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2018 Nov; 149(11):960-966. PubMed ID: 30219207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening.
    AlKhalili R; Shukla PA; Patel RH; Sanghvi S; Hubbi B
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 25488695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Readability of AAOS Patient Education Materials: Evaluating the Progress Since 2008.
    Roberts H; Zhang D; Dyer GS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Sep; 98(17):e70. PubMed ID: 27605695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care.
    Stossel LM; Segar N; Gliatto P; Fallar R; Karani R
    J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Sep; 27(9):1165-70. PubMed ID: 22528620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clearly written, easily comprehended? The readability of websites providing information on epilepsy.
    Brigo F; Otte WM; Igwe SC; Tezzon F; Nardone R
    Epilepsy Behav; 2015 Mar; 44():35-9. PubMed ID: 25601720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to uterine artery embolization.
    Shukla P; Sanghvi SP; Lelkes VM; Kumar A; Contractor S
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 23452554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures.
    Sanghvi S; Cherla DV; Shukla PA; Eloy JA
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Sep; 122(9):1943-8. PubMed ID: 22833340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analyzing the Readability of Online Urogynecologic Patient Information.
    Stewart JR; Heit MH; Meriwether KV; Hobson DT; Francis SL
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 29117016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
    Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia.
    Joseph P; Silva NA; Nanda A; Gupta G
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e934-e938. PubMed ID: 32992056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readability of Wikipedia Pages on Autoimmune Disorders: Systematic Quantitative Assessment.
    Watad A; Bragazzi NL; Brigo F; Sharif K; Amital H; McGonagle D; Shoenfeld Y; Adawi M
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e260. PubMed ID: 28720555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The readability of informed consent forms for research studies conducted in South Africa.
    Fischer AE; Venter WDF; Collins S; Carman M; Lalla-Edward ST
    S Afr Med J; 2021 Feb; 111(2):180-183. PubMed ID: 33944731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.