These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28255792)

  • 1. The Impact of Health, Wealth, and Attractiveness on Romantic Evaluation from Photographs of Faces.
    Tskhay KO; Clout JM; Rule NO
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Nov; 46(8):2365-2376. PubMed ID: 28255792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Men's, but not women's, sociosexual orientation predicts couples' perceptions of sexually dimorphic cues in own-sex faces.
    Kandrik M; Fincher CL; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Jul; 43(5):965-71. PubMed ID: 24366658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reading men's faces: women's mate attractiveness judgments track men's testosterone and interest in infants.
    Roney JR; Hanson KN; Durante KM; Maestripieri D
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Sep; 273(1598):2169-75. PubMed ID: 16901836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial and self-report questionnaire measures capture different aspects of romantic partner preferences.
    South Palomares JK; Young AW
    Br J Psychol; 2019 Aug; 110(3):549-575. PubMed ID: 30270430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-Perceived Mate Value, Facial Attractiveness, and Mate Preferences: Do Desirable Men Want It All?
    Arnocky S
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(1):1474704918763271. PubMed ID: 29534596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlated male preferences for femininity in female faces and voices.
    Fraccaro PJ; Feinberg DR; DeBruine LM; Little AC; Watkins CD; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2010 Aug; 8(3):447-61. PubMed ID: 22947812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women's preferences for direct gaze.
    Conway CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
    Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):109-21. PubMed ID: 19460236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sociosexual attitudes and dyadic sexual desire independently predict women's preferences for male vocal masculinity.
    O'Connor JJ; Jones BC; Fraccaro PJ; Tigue CC; Pisanski K; Feinberg DR
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Oct; 43(7):1343-53. PubMed ID: 24830906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Men's strategic preferences for femininity in female faces.
    Little AC; Jones BC; Feinberg DR; Perrett DI
    Br J Psychol; 2014 Aug; 105(3):364-81. PubMed ID: 25040006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of control of resources on magnitudes of sex differences in human mate preferences.
    Moore F; Cassidy C; Perrett DI
    Evol Psychol; 2010 Dec; 8(4):720-35. PubMed ID: 22947829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of attractiveness and status in dating desire in homosexual and heterosexual men and women.
    Ha T; van den Berg JE; Engels RC; Lichtwarck-Aschoff A
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Jun; 41(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 21979410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sociosexuality predicts women's preferences for symmetry in men's faces.
    Quist MC; Watkins CD; Smith FG; Little AC; Debruine LM; Jones BC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Dec; 41(6):1415-21. PubMed ID: 21882053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What's in a kiss? The effect of romantic kissing on mating desirability.
    Wlodarski R; Dunbar RI
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Mar; 12(1):178-99. PubMed ID: 25299759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of men's beauty and attractiveness by women with low sexual desire.
    Ferdenzi C; Delplanque S; Vorontsova-Wenger O; Pool E; Bianchi-Demicheli F; Sander D
    J Sex Med; 2015 Apr; 12(4):946-55. PubMed ID: 25496510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Men's Sexual Faithfulness Judgments May Contain a Kernel of Truth.
    Leivers S; Simmons LW; Rhodes G
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134007. PubMed ID: 26244776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?
    Eastwick PW; Finkel EJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Feb; 94(2):245-64. PubMed ID: 18211175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex and age differences in mate-selection preferences.
    Schwarz S; Hassebrauck M
    Hum Nat; 2012 Dec; 23(4):447-66. PubMed ID: 22941269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What do women's advertised mate preferences reveal? An analysis of video dating profiles.
    Goetz CD
    Evol Psychol; 2013 May; 11(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 23718946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of religious veiling on Muslim men's attractiveness ratings of Muslim women.
    Pazhoohi F; Hosseinchari M
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Aug; 43(6):1083-6. PubMed ID: 24464549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
    Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.