These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28255903)

  • 1. Reduction of metal artifacts due to dental hardware in computed tomography angiography: assessment of the utility of model-based iterative reconstruction.
    Kuya K; Shinohara Y; Kato A; Sakamoto M; Kurosaki M; Ogawa T
    Neuroradiology; 2017 Mar; 59(3):231-235. PubMed ID: 28255903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image quality of CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease: comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Son SS; Choo KS; Jeon UB; Jeon GR; Nam KJ; Kim TU; Yeom JA; Hwang JY; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():31-8. PubMed ID: 25414055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: image quality assessment in the cervicothoracic region.
    Katsura M; Sato J; Akahane M; Matsuda I; Ishida M; Yasaka K; Kunimatsu A; Ohtomo K
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 23199752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
    Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
    Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) for the Reduction of Metal Artifacts on CT.
    Boudabbous S; Arditi D; Paulin E; Syrogiannopoulou A; Becker C; Montet X
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):380-5. PubMed ID: 26204291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Model-based iterative reconstruction compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection in CT of the kidneys and the adjacent retroperitoneum.
    Olcott EW; Shin LK; Sommer G; Chan I; Rosenberg J; Molvin FL; Boas FE; Fleischmann D
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):774-84. PubMed ID: 24809318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CT angiography after carotid artery stenting: assessment of the utility of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction.
    Kuya K; Shinohara Y; Sakamoto M; Iwata N; Kishimoto J; Fujii S; Kaminou T; Watanabe T; Ogawa T
    Neuroradiology; 2014 Nov; 56(11):947-53. PubMed ID: 25117504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Nagasawa N; Murashima S; Sakuma H
    BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Aug; 13():27. PubMed ID: 23927627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithms on high-resolution computed tomography in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease.
    Katsura M; Sato J; Akahane M; Mise Y; Sumida K; Abe O
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():243-251. PubMed ID: 28668422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Lin XZ; Machida H; Tanaka I; Fukui R; Ueno E; Chen KM; Yan FH
    Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 24496703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
    Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
    Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) on image quality in cerebral CT angiography before and after intracranial aneurysm treatment.
    Hajdu SD; Daniel RT; Meuli RA; Zerlauth JB; Dunet V
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 May; 102():109-114. PubMed ID: 29685523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Iterative Image Reconstruction Improves the Accuracy of Automated Plaque Burden Assessment in Coronary CT Angiography: A Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound.
    Puchner SB; Ferencik M; Maehara A; Stolzmann P; Ma S; Do S; Kauczor HU; Mintz GS; Hoffmann U; Schlett CL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):777-784. PubMed ID: 28177655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image quality improvement using model-based iterative reconstruction in low dose chest CT for children with necrotizing pneumonia.
    Sun J; Yu T; Liu J; Duan X; Hu D; Liu Y; Peng Y
    BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Mar; 17(1):24. PubMed ID: 28302073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the image qualities of filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction for CT venography at 80 kVp.
    Kim JH; Choo KS; Moon TY; Lee JW; Jeon UB; Kim TU; Hwang JY; Yun MJ; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2055-63. PubMed ID: 26486938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of Filtered Back Projection, Adaptive Statistical, and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction for Reduced Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography.
    Padole A; Singh S; Lira D; Blake MA; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Choy G; Saini S; Do S; Kalra MK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 25734468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CT Dose Reduction for Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurement: Effects of Model-Based and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructions and Filtered Back Projection.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Niijima Y; Hashimoto M; Yamada M; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):W677-83. PubMed ID: 26001256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.