208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28255903)
1. Reduction of metal artifacts due to dental hardware in computed tomography angiography: assessment of the utility of model-based iterative reconstruction.
Kuya K; Shinohara Y; Kato A; Sakamoto M; Kurosaki M; Ogawa T
Neuroradiology; 2017 Mar; 59(3):231-235. PubMed ID: 28255903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image quality of CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease: comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Son SS; Choo KS; Jeon UB; Jeon GR; Nam KJ; Kim TU; Yeom JA; Hwang JY; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():31-8. PubMed ID: 25414055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: image quality assessment in the cervicothoracic region.
Katsura M; Sato J; Akahane M; Matsuda I; Ishida M; Yasaka K; Kunimatsu A; Ohtomo K
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 23199752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) for the Reduction of Metal Artifacts on CT.
Boudabbous S; Arditi D; Paulin E; Syrogiannopoulou A; Becker C; Montet X
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):380-5. PubMed ID: 26204291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Model-based iterative reconstruction compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection in CT of the kidneys and the adjacent retroperitoneum.
Olcott EW; Shin LK; Sommer G; Chan I; Rosenberg J; Molvin FL; Boas FE; Fleischmann D
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):774-84. PubMed ID: 24809318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT angiography after carotid artery stenting: assessment of the utility of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction.
Kuya K; Shinohara Y; Sakamoto M; Iwata N; Kishimoto J; Fujii S; Kaminou T; Watanabe T; Ogawa T
Neuroradiology; 2014 Nov; 56(11):947-53. PubMed ID: 25117504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Nagasawa N; Murashima S; Sakuma H
BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Aug; 13():27. PubMed ID: 23927627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithms on high-resolution computed tomography in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease.
Katsura M; Sato J; Akahane M; Mise Y; Sumida K; Abe O
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():243-251. PubMed ID: 28668422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Lin XZ; Machida H; Tanaka I; Fukui R; Ueno E; Chen KM; Yan FH
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 24496703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) on image quality in cerebral CT angiography before and after intracranial aneurysm treatment.
Hajdu SD; Daniel RT; Meuli RA; Zerlauth JB; Dunet V
Eur J Radiol; 2018 May; 102():109-114. PubMed ID: 29685523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Iterative Image Reconstruction Improves the Accuracy of Automated Plaque Burden Assessment in Coronary CT Angiography: A Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound.
Puchner SB; Ferencik M; Maehara A; Stolzmann P; Ma S; Do S; Kauczor HU; Mintz GS; Hoffmann U; Schlett CL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):777-784. PubMed ID: 28177655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image quality improvement using model-based iterative reconstruction in low dose chest CT for children with necrotizing pneumonia.
Sun J; Yu T; Liu J; Duan X; Hu D; Liu Y; Peng Y
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Mar; 17(1):24. PubMed ID: 28302073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the image qualities of filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction for CT venography at 80 kVp.
Kim JH; Choo KS; Moon TY; Lee JW; Jeon UB; Kim TU; Hwang JY; Yun MJ; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2055-63. PubMed ID: 26486938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of Filtered Back Projection, Adaptive Statistical, and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction for Reduced Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography.
Padole A; Singh S; Lira D; Blake MA; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Choy G; Saini S; Do S; Kalra MK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 25734468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT Dose Reduction for Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurement: Effects of Model-Based and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructions and Filtered Back Projection.
Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Niijima Y; Hashimoto M; Yamada M; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):W677-83. PubMed ID: 26001256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
