184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28256273)
1. Direct resin composite restorations for fractured maxillary teeth and diastema closure: A 7 years retrospective evaluation of survival and influencing factors.
Lempel E; Lovász BV; Meszarics R; Jeges S; Tóth Á; Szalma J
Dent Mater; 2017 Apr; 33(4):467-476. PubMed ID: 28256273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longevity of direct diastema closure and recontouring restorations with resin composites in maxillary anterior teeth: A 4-year clinical evaluation.
Korkut B; Türkmen C
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Jun; 33(4):590-604. PubMed ID: 33354867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-year retrospective evaluation of monoshade universal composites in direct veneer and diastema closure restorations.
Korkut B; Ünal T; Can E
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Apr; 35(3):525-537. PubMed ID: 36478098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A 4-year clinical evaluation of direct composite build-ups for space closure after orthodontic treatment.
Demirci M; Tuncer S; Öztaş E; Tekçe N; Uysal Ö
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Dec; 19(9):2187-99. PubMed ID: 25802222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term clinical evaluation of direct resin composite restorations in vital vs. endodontically treated posterior teeth - Retrospective study up to 13 years.
Lempel E; Lovász BV; Bihari E; Krajczár K; Jeges S; Tóth Á; Szalma J
Dent Mater; 2019 Sep; 35(9):1308-1318. PubMed ID: 31278018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrospective evaluation of posterior direct composite restorations: 10-year findings.
Lempel E; Tóth Á; Fábián T; Krajczár K; Szalma J
Dent Mater; 2015 Feb; 31(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 25480695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 5-year retrospective evaluation of direct composite restorations in orthodontically treated patients.
Comba A; Vergano EA; Baldi A; Alovisi M; Pasqualini D; Castroflorio T; Stura I; Migliaretti G; Berutti E; Scotti N
J Dent; 2021 Jan; 104():103510. PubMed ID: 33130052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effect of Ground and Unground Enamel on the Clinical Performance of Direct Composite Build-up After Orthodontic Treatment: Five Years of Follow-up.
Demirci M; Tuncer S; Tekçe N; Öztaş E; Baydemir C
Oper Dent; 2023 Sep; 48(5):E106-E118. PubMed ID: 37503637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recontouring teeth and closing diastemas with direct composite buildups: a 5-year follow-up.
Frese C; Schiller P; Staehle HJ; Wolff D
J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):979-85. PubMed ID: 23954577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recontouring teeth and closing diastemas with direct composite buildups: a clinical evaluation of survival and quality parameters.
Wolff D; Kraus T; Schach C; Pritsch M; Mente J; Staehle HJ; Ding P
J Dent; 2010 Dec; 38(12):1001-9. PubMed ID: 20826192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer, nanohybrid and nanofill composite restorative systems in posterior teeth.
Mahmoud SH; El-Embaby AE; AbdAllah AM; Hamama HH
J Adhes Dent; 2008 Aug; 10(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 18792703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996-2015): A meta-analysis of prospective studies.
Beck F; Lettner S; Graf A; Bitriol B; Dumitrescu N; Bauer P; Moritz A; Schedle A
Dent Mater; 2015 Aug; 31(8):958-85. PubMed ID: 26091581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.
Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1232-44. PubMed ID: 26321155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two different composite resins used for tooth reshaping and diastema closure in a 4-year follow-up.
Ergin E; Kutuk ZB; Cakir FY; Gurgan S
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Sep; 21(9):1098-1106. PubMed ID: 30156192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 5.5-year-survival of CAD/CAM resin-based composite restorations in severe tooth wear patients.
Maier E; Crins L; Pereira-Cenci T; Bronkhorst E; Opdam N; Galler K; Loomans B
Dent Mater; 2024 May; 40(5):767-776. PubMed ID: 38458918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical Performance of Direct Composite Restorations in Patients with Amelogenesis Imperfecta - Anterior Restorations.
Tekçe N; Demirci M; Tuncer S; Güder G; Sancak EI
J Adhes Dent; 2022 Mar; 24(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 35322945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 6.5-year clinical follow-up of direct resin composite buildups in the posterior dentition: Introduction of a new minimally invasive restorative method.
Staehle HJ; Wohlrab T; Saure D; Wolff D; Frese C
J Dent; 2015 Oct; 43(10):1211-7. PubMed ID: 26165864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of lithium disilicate versus indirect resin composite partial posterior restorations - A 7.8-year retrospective study.
Lempel E; Gyulai S; Lovász BV; Jeges S; Szalma J
Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 37821330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
