184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28256273)
21. Randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial of direct laminate veneers with two micro-hybrid resin composites.
Gresnigt MM; Kalk W; Ozcan M
J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):766-75. PubMed ID: 22664565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. 18-year survival of posterior composite resin restorations with and without glass ionomer cement as base.
van de Sande FH; Rodolpho PA; Basso GR; Patias R; da Rosa QF; Demarco FF; Opdam NJ; Cenci MS
Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):669-75. PubMed ID: 25863523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Are there universal restorative composites for anterior and posterior teeth?
Baldissera RA; Corrêa MB; Schuch HS; Collares K; Nascimento GG; Jardim PS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):1027-35. PubMed ID: 24001506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Anterior composite restorations: A systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure.
Demarco FF; Collares K; Coelho-de-Souza FH; Correa MB; Cenci MS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ
Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1214-24. PubMed ID: 26303655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: results from a paediatric dental clinic.
Pinto Gdos S; Oliveira LJ; Romano AR; Schardosim LR; Bonow ML; Pacce M; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Torriani DD
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1248-54. PubMed ID: 25150105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Survival analysis of composite Dahl restorations provided to manage localised anterior tooth wear (ten year follow-up).
Gulamali AB; Hemmings KW; Tredwin CJ; Petrie A
Br Dent J; 2011 Aug; 211(4):E9. PubMed ID: 21869770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [The long-term results of teeth restoration with composite resin materials: a systematic literature review].
Kodzaeva ZS; Turkina AY; Doroshina VY
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2019; 98(3):117-122. PubMed ID: 31322607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Crown vs. composite for post-retained restorations: A randomized clinical trial.
Skupien JA; Cenci MS; Opdam NJ; Kreulen CM; Huysmans MC; Pereira-Cenci T
J Dent; 2016 May; 48():34-9. PubMed ID: 26976553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Closure of diastema and gingival recontouring using direct adhesive restorations: a case report.
De Araujo EM; Fortkamp S; Baratieri LN
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(4):229-40. PubMed ID: 19689720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.
Casagrande L; Seminario AT; Correa MB; Werle SB; Maltz M; Demarco FF; Araujo FB
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):847-855. PubMed ID: 27103587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Longevity of class 2 direct restorations in root-filled teeth: A retrospective clinical study.
Scotti N; Eruli C; Comba A; Paolino DS; Alovisi M; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
J Dent; 2015 May; 43(5):499-505. PubMed ID: 25701467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations after up to 33 years.
Da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Rodolfo B; Collares K; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Opdam NJM; Cenci MS; Moraes RR
Dent Mater; 2022 Apr; 38(4):680-688. PubMed ID: 35221128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.
Sadeghi M; Lynch CD; Shahamat N
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 20202097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A retrospective clinical study of cervical restorations: longevity and failure-prognostic variables.
Namgung C; Rho YJ; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 23215544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Survival and Associated Risk Factors of Resin-based Composite Restorations in Primary Teeth: A Clinical, Retrospective, University-based Study.
Pedrotti D; Ribeiro JF; Weber Pires C; de Oliveira Rocha R; Ardenghi TM; Soares FZM; Lenzi TL
Pediatr Dent; 2017 Jul; 39(4):313-318. PubMed ID: 29122073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
