These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28256273)
41. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in Public Dental Health Service: a prospective 8 years follow up. Pallesen U; van Dijken JW; Halken J; Hallonsten AL; Höigaard R J Dent; 2013 Apr; 41(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 23228499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations. Lange RT; Pfeiffer P Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 19544814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Five-year Clinical Evaluation of a Nanofilled and a Nanohybrid Composite in Class IV Cavities. Demirci M; Tuncer S; Sancakli HS; Tekçe N; Baydemir C Oper Dent; 2018; 43(3):261-271. PubMed ID: 29533716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Longevity of Direct Resin Composite Restorations in Maxillary Anterior Crown Fractures: A 4-year Clinical Evaluation. Korkut B; Özcan M Oper Dent; 2022 Mar; 47(2):138-148. PubMed ID: 35604829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Patient risk factors' influence on survival of posterior composites. van de Sande FH; Opdam NJ; Rodolpho PA; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Cenci MS J Dent Res; 2013 Jul; 92(7 Suppl):78S-83S. PubMed ID: 23690354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Marginal quality of posterior microhybrid resin composite restorations applied using two polymerisation protocols: 5-year randomised split mouth trial. Barabanti N; Gagliani M; Roulet JF; Testori T; Ozcan M; Cerutti A J Dent; 2013 May; 41(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 23454329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Longevity of 2- and 3-surface restorations in posterior teeth of 25- to 30-year-olds attending Public Dental Service-A 13-year observation. Palotie U; Eronen AK; Vehkalahti K; Vehkalahti MM J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():13-17. PubMed ID: 28529175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Clinical performance of ormocer, nanofilled, and nanoceramic resin composites in Class I and Class II restorations: a three-year evaluation. Mahmoud SH; El-Embaby AE; AbdAllah AM Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 23614660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations. Yazici AR; Antonson SA; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E Oper Dent; 2017; 42(5):478-485. PubMed ID: 28581919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Longevity of direct restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities: a retrospective study. Rho YJ; Namgung C; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):572-82. PubMed ID: 23550914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Three-year evaluation of posterior vertical bite reconstruction using direct resin composite--a case series. Schmidlin PR; Filli T; Imfeld C; Tepper S; Attin T Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 19192844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Survival Rates from Fracture of Endodontically Treated Premolars Restored with Full-coverage Crowns or Direct Resin Composite Restorations: A Retrospective Study. Suksaphar W; Banomyong D; Jirathanyanatt T; Ngoenwiwatkul Y J Endod; 2018 Feb; 44(2):233-238. PubMed ID: 29208401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The role of emergence profile in papilla maintenance after diastema closure with direct composite resin restorations. Sobrinho KN; Lima LM; Cohen-Carneiro F; Silva LM; Martins LM; Pontes DG Gen Dent; 2016; 64(3):e1-4. PubMed ID: 27148664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations. Pallesen U; van Dijken JW J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1547-58. PubMed ID: 26363442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]