443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28257409)
1. A Case Study of the Philadelphia Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Policymaking Process: Implications for Policy Development and Advocacy.
Purtle J; Langellier B; Lê-Scherban F
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2018; 24(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 28257409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chile's 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax and changes in prices and purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages: An observational study in an urban environment.
Caro JC; Corvalán C; Reyes M; Silva A; Popkin B; Taillie LS
PLoS Med; 2018 Jul; 15(7):e1002597. PubMed ID: 29969444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Funding quality pre-kindergarten slots with Philadelphia's new 'sugary drink tax': simulating effects of using an excise tax to address a social determinant of health.
Langellier BA; Lê-Scherban F; Purtle J
Public Health Nutr; 2017 Sep; 20(13):2450-2458. PubMed ID: 28774355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Industry strategies in the parliamentary process of adopting a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in South Africa: a systematic mapping.
Abdool Karim S; Kruger P; Hofman K
Global Health; 2020 Dec; 16(1):116. PubMed ID: 33302993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.
Roberto CA; Lawman HG; LeVasseur MT; Mitra N; Peterhans A; Herring B; Bleich SN
JAMA; 2019 May; 321(18):1799-1810. PubMed ID: 31087022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. "Holding the City's Feet to the Fire": Lessons Learned From Oakland's Implementation of Measure HH Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.
Asada Y; Chriqui JF; Pipito AA; Taher S; Powell LM
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2022 Jan-Feb 01; 28(1):E137-E145. PubMed ID: 34797249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness and Policy Determinants of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes.
Hagenaars LL; Jeurissen PPT; Klazinga NS; Listl S; Jevdjevic M
J Dent Res; 2021 Dec; 100(13):1444-1451. PubMed ID: 34034538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Examining the policy process of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in Ireland.
Crosbie E; Florence D; Nanthaseang M; Godoy L
Health Policy; 2022 Aug; 126(8):738-743. PubMed ID: 35718666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pro- and Anti-Tax Framing in News Articles About California Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Campaigns from 2014-2018.
Garcia K; Mejia P; Perez-Sanz S; Dorfman L; Madsen K; Schillinger D
J Health Commun; 2023 Oct; 28(10):658-668. PubMed ID: 37682070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Politics of Taxes for Health: An Analysis of the Passage of the Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in Mexico.
James E; Lajous M; Reich MR
Health Syst Reform; 2020; 6(1):e1669122. PubMed ID: 32043913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-income parents' perceptions of a sweetened beverage tax in Philadelphia.
Edmondson EK; Shea JA; Gregory EF; Roberto CA; Garcia SM; Kwon J; Virudachalam S
J Nutr Sci; 2022; 11():e67. PubMed ID: 36106086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploring perceptions of the Mexican sugar-sweetened beverage tax among adolescents in north-west Mexico: a qualitative study.
Ortega-Avila AG; Papadaki A; Jago R
Public Health Nutr; 2018 Feb; 21(3):618-626. PubMed ID: 29061203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examining the Role and Strategies of Advocacy Coalitions in California's Statewide Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Debate (2001-2018).
Garibay KK; Burke NJ; Ramírez AS; Payán DD
Am J Health Promot; 2024 Jan; 38(1):101-111. PubMed ID: 37728321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Corporations' use and misuse of evidence to influence health policy: a case study of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation.
Fooks GJ; Williams S; Box G; Sacks G
Global Health; 2019 Sep; 15(1):56. PubMed ID: 31551086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Six lessons from introducing sweetened beverage taxes in Berkeley, Cook County, and Philadelphia: A case study comparison in agenda setting and decision making.
Hagenaars LL; Jevdjevic M; Jeurissen PPT; Klazinga NS
Health Policy; 2020 Sep; 124(9):932-942. PubMed ID: 32561127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Policy networks and competing interests in the development of the Mexican sugar-sweetened beverages tax.
Carriedo A; Cairney P; Barquera S; Hawkins B
BMJ Glob Health; 2023 Oct; 8(Suppl 8):. PubMed ID: 37813438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.
Roberto CA; Lawman HG; LeVasseur MT; Mitra N; Peterhans A; Herring B; Bleich SN
JAMA; 2019 May; 321(18):1799-1810. PubMed ID: 32930704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Public support for a sugar-sweetened beverage tax and pro-tax messages in a Mid-Atlantic US state.
Donaldson EA; Cohen JE; Rutkow L; Villanti AC; Kanarek NF; Barry CL
Public Health Nutr; 2015 Aug; 18(12):2263-73. PubMed ID: 25430945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Progress in the Pacific on sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: a systematic review of policy changes from 2000 to 2019.
Teng A; Snowdon W; Win Tin ST; Genç M; Na'ati E; Puloka V; Signal L; Wilson N
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2021 Aug; 45(4):376-384. PubMed ID: 34097355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of Public Testimony About Philadelphia's Sweetened Beverage Tax.
Elstein JG; Lowery CM; Sangoi P; Peterhans A; Bleich SN; Lawman HG; Roberto CA
Am J Prev Med; 2022 Mar; 62(3):e178-e187. PubMed ID: 34753646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
