228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28258355)
1. The performance of PI-RADSv2 and quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting confirmatory prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of prostate cancer.
Nougaret S; Robertson N; Golia Pernicka J; Molinari N; Hötker AM; Ehdaie B; Sala E; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 28258355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System versions 1 and 2 for the Detection of Peripheral Zone Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Cancers.
Krishna S; McInnes M; Lim C; Lim R; Hakim SW; Flood TA; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):W365-W373. PubMed ID: 28981356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Assist PI-RADS Version 2 DWI Scoring? A Correlation Study Using the PI-RADSv2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Systems.
Gaur S; Harmon S; Rosenblum L; Greer MD; Mehralivand S; Coskun M; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Shih JH; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jul; 211(1):W33-W41. PubMed ID: 29733695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PI-RADS Version 2: Detection of Clinically Significant Cancer in Patients With Biopsy Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer.
Seo JW; Shin SJ; Taik Oh Y; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Park SY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):W1-W9. PubMed ID: 28418690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient parameters with prostate imaging reporting and data system V2 assessment for detection of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate cancer.
Hassanzadeh E; Alessandrino F; Olubiyi OI; Glazer DI; Mulkern RV; Fedorov A; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 May; 43(5):1237-1244. PubMed ID: 28840280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined Analysis of Biparametric MRI and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density: Role in the Prebiopsy Diagnosis of Gleason Score 7 or Greater Prostate Cancer.
Lee SJ; Oh YT; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Park SY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):W166-W172. PubMed ID: 30016148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive role of PI-RADSv2 and ADC parameters in differentiating Gleason pattern 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 prostate cancer.
Alessandrino F; Taghipour M; Hassanzadeh E; Ziaei A; Vangel M; Fedorov A; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jan; 44(1):279-285. PubMed ID: 30066169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, Assessment Categories and Pathologic Outcomes in Patients With Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed at Biopsy.
Lim CS; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Breau RH; Morash C; Thornhill RE; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 28267359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk Stratification Among Men With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 Category 3 Transition Zone Lesions: Is Biopsy Always Necessary?
Felker ER; Raman SS; Margolis DJ; Lu DSK; Shaheen N; Natarajan S; Sharma D; Huang J; Dorey F; Marks LS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1272-1277. PubMed ID: 28858541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of PI-RADS Version 2 for Prediction of Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With Gleason Score 6.
Song W; Bang SH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Kim CK; Lee HM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):281-287. PubMed ID: 29550198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Sufficiently Discovering Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer? Per-Lesion Radiology-Pathology Correlation Study.
Lee MS; Moon MH; Kim YA; Sung CK; Woo H; Jeong H; Son H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jul; 211(1):114-120. PubMed ID: 29702017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of the addition of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient data on the diagnostic performance of the PI-RADS v2 scoring system to detect clinically significant prostate cancer.
Moraes MO; Roman DHH; Copetti J; de S Santos F; Agra A; Noronha JAP; Carvalhal G; Neto EJD; Zanon M; Baldisserotto M; Hochhegger B
World J Urol; 2020 Apr; 38(4):981-991. PubMed ID: 31175458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PI-RADS version 2: quantitative analysis aids reliable interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging for prostate cancer.
Park SY; Shin SJ; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Rha KH; Hong SJ; Oh YT
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):2776-2783. PubMed ID: 27957637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, on MRI Diagnosis for Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer.
Matsuoka Y; Ishioka J; Tanaka H; Kimura T; Yoshida S; Saito K; Fujii Y; Kihara K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):W76-W84. PubMed ID: 28570124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and qualitative in-house categorization system in detection of prostate cancer.
Gaur S; Harmon S; Mehralivand S; Bednarova S; Calio BP; Sugano D; Sidana A; Merino MJ; Pinto PA; Wood BJ; Shih JH; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1326-1335. PubMed ID: 29603833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging has limited added value over T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging when using PI-RADSv2 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with elevated PSA.
De Visschere P; Lumen N; Ost P; Decaestecker K; Pattyn E; Villeirs G
Clin Radiol; 2017 Jan; 72(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 27726850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of PI-RADSv2 with multiparametric MRI in determining who needs active surveillance or definitive treatment according to PRIAS.
Park JJ; Park BK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 45(6):1753-1759. PubMed ID: 27783436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performance and reproducibility of T2w based and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) based PI-RADSv2 lexicon descriptors for prostate MRI.
Benndorf M; Hahn F; Krönig M; Jilg CA; Krauss T; Langer M; Dovi-Akué P
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():9-15. PubMed ID: 28668436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra- and interreader reproducibility of PI-RADSv2: A multireader study.
Smith CP; Harmon SA; Barrett T; Bittencourt LK; Law YM; Shebel H; An JY; Czarniecki M; Mehralivand S; Coskun M; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Shih JH; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(6):1694-1703. PubMed ID: 30575184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PI-RADS version 2: Preoperative role in the detection of normal-sized pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.
Park SY; Shin SJ; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Rha KH; Hong SJ; Oh YT
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jun; 91():22-28. PubMed ID: 28629566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
