These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28258436)

  • 1. Sex differences in equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: effects on N2 and P3.
    Melynyte S; Ruksenas O; Griskova-Bulanova I
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1565-1574. PubMed ID: 28258436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Go and NoGo: modulation of electrophysiological correlates by female sex steroid hormones.
    Griskova-Bulanova I; Griksiene R; Voicikas A; Ruksenas O
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Jul; 233(13):2607-15. PubMed ID: 27137197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequential processing in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task with variable interstimulus interval.
    Borchard JP; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Aug; 97(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 26024616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effects of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment on Go/NoGo Semantic Categorization Task Performance and Event-Related Potentials.
    Mudar RA; Chiang HS; Eroh J; Nguyen LT; Maguire MJ; Spence JS; Kung F; Kraut MA; Hart J
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2016; 50(2):577-90. PubMed ID: 26836634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: children vs. adults.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Borchard JP
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Oct; 125(10):1995-2006. PubMed ID: 24661623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a temporal PCA study.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 23792217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23643562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the use of event-related potentials to auditory stimuli in the Go/NoGo task.
    Smith JL; Douglas KM
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Sep; 193(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 21764566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prestimulus delta and theta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 23073074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
    Jia H; Li H; Yu D
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 119(3):704-714. PubMed ID: 18164657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of amnestic mild cognitive impairment on N2 and P3 Go/NoGo ERP components.
    Cid-Fernández S; Lindín M; Díaz F
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2014; 38(2):295-306. PubMed ID: 23963292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time course of automatic emotion regulation during a facial Go/Nogo task.
    Zhang W; Lu J
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Feb; 89(2):444-9. PubMed ID: 22200654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sequential processing in young and older adults in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Cave AE
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 May; 127(5):2273-85. PubMed ID: 27072100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different relationships between central dopamine system and sub-processes of inhibition: Spontaneous eye blink rate relates with N2 but not P3 in a Go/Nogo task.
    Zhang T; Wang C; Tan F; Mou D; Zheng L; Chen A
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Jun; 105():95-103. PubMed ID: 27115071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CNV resolution does not cause NoGo anteriorisation of the P3: a failure to replicate Simson et al.
    Smith JL; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 23669175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Event-related potentials for response inhibition in Parkinson's disease.
    Bokura H; Yamaguchi S; Kobayashi S
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):967-75. PubMed ID: 15716167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationship of N2 and P3 to inhibitory processing of social drinkers in a Go/NoGo task.
    Oddy BW; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Jun; 72(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 19250950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.