BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28258437)

  • 1. Exploring the temporal dynamics of sustained and transient spatial attention using steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Zhang D; Hong B; Gao S; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1575-1591. PubMed ID: 28258437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring steady-state visual evoked potentials as an index for intermodal and crossmodal spatial attention.
    Zhang D; Hong B; Gao X; Gao S; Röder B
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):665-75. PubMed ID: 20874752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional modulation of neural responses to illusory shapes: Evidence from steady-state and evoked visual potentials.
    Wittenhagen L; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Mar; 125():70-80. PubMed ID: 30711611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sustained Splits of Attention within versus across Visual Hemifields Produce Distinct Spatial Gain Profiles.
    Walter S; Keitel C; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 28(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 26401813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Competitive interactions of attentional resources in early visual cortex during sustained visuospatial attention within or between visual hemifields: evidence for the different-hemifield advantage.
    Walter S; Quigley C; Mueller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 May; 26(5):938-54. PubMed ID: 24345166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orienting and maintenance of spatial attention in audition and vision: an event-related brain potential study.
    Salmi J; Rinne T; Degerman A; Alho K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3725-33. PubMed ID: 17610592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing.
    Andersen SK; Fuchs S; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19702461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield.
    Malinowski P; Fuchs S; Müller MM
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Feb; 414(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 17207932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concurrent recording of steady-state and transient event-related potentials as indices of visual-spatial selective attention.
    Müller MM; Hillyard S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Sep; 111(9):1544-52. PubMed ID: 10964063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of sustained selective attention on steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Mahajan Y; Ching A; Watson T; Kim J; Davis C
    Exp Brain Res; 2022 Jan; 240(1):249-261. PubMed ID: 34727219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Additive effects of emotional content and spatial selective attention on electrocortical facilitation.
    Keil A; Moratti S; Sabatinelli D; Bradley MM; Lang PJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Aug; 15(8):1187-97. PubMed ID: 15590910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time courses of attentional modulation in neural amplification and synchronization measured with steady-state visual-evoked potentials.
    Kashiwase Y; Matsumiya K; Kuriki I; Shioiri S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Aug; 24(8):1779-93. PubMed ID: 22360591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional Selection of Feature Conjunctions Is Accomplished by Parallel and Independent Selection of Single Features.
    Andersen SK; Müller MM; Hillyard SA
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 35(27):9912-9. PubMed ID: 26156992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 15068597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unimodal and crossmodal gradients of spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Föcker J; Hötting K; Gondan M; Röder B
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Mar; 23(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19821021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shifts of visual spatial attention modulate a steady-state visual evoked potential.
    Belmonte M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1998 Apr; 6(4):295-307. PubMed ID: 9593953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemifield Crossings during Multiple Object Tracking Affect Task Performance and Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials.
    Minami T; Shinkai T; Nakauchi S
    Neuroscience; 2019 Jun; 409():162-168. PubMed ID: 31034975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential.
    Morgan ST; Hansen JC; Hillyard SA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 May; 93(10):4770-4. PubMed ID: 8643478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.