These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28260530)

  • 21. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
    Liberati A; Altman DG; Tetzlaff J; Mulrow C; Gøtzsche PC; Ioannidis JP; Clarke M; Devereaux PJ; Kleijnen J; Moher D
    PLoS Med; 2009 Jul; 6(7):e1000100. PubMed ID: 19621070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement.
    McInnes MDF; Moher D; Thombs BD; McGrath TA; Bossuyt PM; ; Clifford T; Cohen JF; Deeks JJ; Gatsonis C; Hooft L; Hunt HA; Hyde CJ; Korevaar DA; Leeflang MMG; Macaskill P; Reitsma JB; Rodin R; Rutjes AWS; Salameh JP; Stevens A; Takwoingi Y; Tonelli M; Weeks L; Whiting P; Willis BH
    JAMA; 2018 Jan; 319(4):388-396. PubMed ID: 29362800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 6: PRISMA-CI extension statement and checklist.
    Guise JM; Butler ME; Chang C; Viswanathan M; Pigott T; Tugwell P;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():43-50. PubMed ID: 28720516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses.
    Johnson BT; Hennessy EA
    Soc Sci Med; 2019 Jul; 233():237-251. PubMed ID: 31233957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: A systematic review.
    Wang X; Welch V; Li M; Yao L; Littell J; Li H; Yang N; Wang J; Shamseer L; Chen Y; Yang K; Grimshaw JM
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2021 Mar; 17(1):e1134. PubMed ID: 37133262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adherence to PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines and scope of systematic reviews published in nursing: A cross-sectional analysis.
    Carlo Torres G; Ledbetter L; Cantrell S; Alomo ARL; Blodgett TJ; Bongar MV; Hatoum S; Hendren S; Loa R; Montaña S; Francis Sumile E; Turner KM; Relf MV
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2024 Jul; 56(4):531-541. PubMed ID: 38553883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.
    Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Kirkham J; Dwan K; Kramer S; Green S; Forbes A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):MR000035. PubMed ID: 25271098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery.
    Cullis PS; Gudlaugsdottir K; Andrews J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175213. PubMed ID: 28384296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Economic Evaluations of Digital Health Interventions for Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review.
    Stanic T; Saygin Avsar T; Gomes M
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Nov; 25():e45958. PubMed ID: 37921844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations.
    Hutton B; Salanti G; Caldwell DM; Chaimani A; Schmid CH; Cameron C; Ioannidis JP; Straus S; Thorlund K; Jansen JP; Mulrow C; Catalá-López F; Gøtzsche PC; Dickersin K; Boutron I; Altman DG; Moher D
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Jun; 162(11):777-84. PubMed ID: 26030634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews.
    Zorzela L; Loke YK; Ioannidis JP; Golder S; Santaguida P; Altman DG; Moher D; Vohra S;
    BMJ; 2016 Feb; 352():i157. PubMed ID: 26830668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.
    Shamseer L; Moher D; Clarke M; Ghersi D; Liberati A; Petticrew M; Shekelle P; Stewart LA;
    BMJ; 2015 Jan; 350():g7647. PubMed ID: 25555855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Recommendations and evidence for reporting items in pediatric clinical trial protocols and reports: two systematic reviews.
    Clyburne-Sherin AV; Thurairajah P; Kapadia MZ; Sampson M; Chan WW; Offringa M
    Trials; 2015 Sep; 16():417. PubMed ID: 26385379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
    Peters MDJ; Marnie C; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Munn Z; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Khalil H
    JBI Evid Synth; 2020 Oct; 18(10):2119-2126. PubMed ID: 33038124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.
    Elsman EBM; Mokkink LB; Terwee CB; Beaton D; Gagnier JJ; Tricco AC; Baba A; Butcher NJ; Smith M; Hofstetter C; Lee Aiyegbusi O; Berardi A; Farmer J; Haywood KL; Krause KR; Markham S; Mayo-Wilson E; Mehdipour A; Ricketts J; Szatmari P; Touma Z; Moher D; Offringa M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Sep; 173():111422. PubMed ID: 38849061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Children in reviews: methodological issues in child-relevant evidence syntheses.
    Cramer K; Wiebe N; Moyer V; Hartling L; Williams K; Swingler G; Klassen TP
    BMC Pediatr; 2005 Sep; 5():38. PubMed ID: 16176579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.