490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28260999)
1. Gut Microbiota Analysis Results Are Highly Dependent on the 16S rRNA Gene Target Region, Whereas the Impact of DNA Extraction Is Minor.
Rintala A; Pietilä S; Munukka E; Eerola E; Pursiheimo JP; Laiho A; Pekkala S; Huovinen P
J Biomol Tech; 2017 Apr; 28(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 28260999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies.
Isokääntä H; Tomnikov N; Vanhatalo S; Munukka E; Huovinen P; Hakanen AJ; Kallonen T
Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0293223. PubMed ID: 38747618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform.
Fouhy F; Clooney AG; Stanton C; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
BMC Microbiol; 2016 Jun; 16(1):123. PubMed ID: 27342980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces.
Velásquez-Mejía EP; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Escobar JS
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 29079861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are all faecal bacteria detected with equal efficiency? A study using next-generation sequencing and quantitative culture of infants' faecal samples.
Sjöberg F; Nookaew I; Yazdanshenas S; Gio-Batta M; Adlerberth I; Wold AE
J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Oct; 177():106018. PubMed ID: 32795633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling.
Lim MY; Song EJ; Kim SH; Lee J; Nam YD
Syst Appl Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 41(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 29305057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.
Abellan-Schneyder I; Matchado MS; Reitmeier S; Sommer A; Sewald Z; Baumbach J; List M; Neuhaus K
mSphere; 2021 Feb; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 33627512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An alternative storage method for characterization of the intestinal microbiota through next generation sequencing.
Ribeiro RM; Souza-Basqueira M; Oliveira LC; Salles FC; Pereira NB; Sabino EC
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2018 Nov; 60():e77. PubMed ID: 30517247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of DNA extraction method and targeted 16S-rRNA hypervariable region on oral microbiota profiling.
Teng F; Darveekaran Nair SS; Zhu P; Li S; Huang S; Li X; Xu J; Yang F
Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16321. PubMed ID: 30397210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fecal microbiota analysis: an overview of sample collection methods and sequencing strategies.
Thomas V; Clark J; Doré J
Future Microbiol; 2015; 10(9):1485-504. PubMed ID: 26347019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Biases on community structure during DNA extraction of shrimp intestinal microbiota revealed by high-throughput sequencing].
Wen C; He Y; Xue M; Liang H; Dong J
Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2016 Jan; 56(1):130-42. PubMed ID: 27305787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimisation of 16S rRNA gut microbiota profiling of extremely low birth weight infants.
Alcon-Giner C; Caim S; Mitra S; Ketskemety J; Wegmann U; Wain J; Belteki G; Clarke P; Hall LJ
BMC Genomics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):841. PubMed ID: 29096601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of direct boiling method with commercial kits for extracting fecal microbiome DNA by Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA tags.
Peng X; Yu KQ; Deng GH; Jiang YX; Wang Y; Zhang GX; Zhou HW
J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Dec; 95(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 23899773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Overlapping Community Compositions of Gut and Fecal Microbiomes in Lab-Reared and Field-Collected German Cockroaches.
Kakumanu ML; Maritz JM; Carlton JM; Schal C
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 84(17):. PubMed ID: 29959246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Storage and handling of human faecal samples affect the gut microbiome composition: A feasibility study.
Ezzy AC; Hagstrom AD; George C; Hamlin AS; Pereg L; Murphy AJ; Winter G
J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Sep; 164():105668. PubMed ID: 31302202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diversity and enterotype in gut bacterial community of adults in Taiwan.
Liang C; Tseng HC; Chen HM; Wang WC; Chiu CM; Chang JY; Lu KY; Weng SL; Chang TH; Chang CH; Weng CT; Wang HM; Huang HD
BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(Suppl 1):932. PubMed ID: 28198673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of a modified phenol/chloroform and commercial-kit methods for extracting DNA from horse fecal material.
Janabi AHD; Kerkhof LJ; McGuinness LR; Biddle AS; McKeever KH
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Oct; 129():14-19. PubMed ID: 27460337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing reveals alterations of intestinal microbiota in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome patients.
Frémont M; Coomans D; Massart S; De Meirleir K
Anaerobe; 2013 Aug; 22():50-6. PubMed ID: 23791918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Capturing the diversity of the human gut microbiota through culture-enriched molecular profiling.
Lau JT; Whelan FJ; Herath I; Lee CH; Collins SM; Bercik P; Surette MG
Genome Med; 2016 Jul; 8(1):72. PubMed ID: 27363992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
