212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28261811)
1. The facial width-to-height ratio determines interpersonal distance preferences in the observer.
Lieberz KA; Windmann S; Geniole SN; McCormick CM; Mueller-Engelmann M; Gruener F; Bornefeld-Ettmann P; Steil R
Aggress Behav; 2017 Sep; 43(5):460-470. PubMed ID: 28261811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detecting implicit cues of aggressiveness in male faces in revictimized female PTSD patients and healthy controls.
Lieberz KA; Müller-Engelmann M; Bornefeld-Ettmann P; Priebe K; Weidmann A; Fydrich T; Geniole SN; McCormick CM; Rausch S; Thome J; Steil R
Psychiatry Res; 2018 Sep; 267():429-437. PubMed ID: 29980121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Age similarities in recognizing threat from faces and diagnostic cues.
Boshyan J; Zebrowitz LA; Franklin RG; McCormick CM; Carré JM
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2014 Sep; 69(5):710-8. PubMed ID: 23743626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How components of facial width to height ratio differently contribute to the perception of social traits.
Costa M; Lio G; Gomez A; Sirigu A
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172739. PubMed ID: 28235081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Body mass index, facial width-to-height ratio, and perceived formidability in female Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) fighters.
Palmer-Hague JL; Twele AC; Fuller AJ
Aggress Behav; 2018 Nov; 44(6):553-560. PubMed ID: 29956344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence from Meta-Analyses of the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio as an Evolved Cue of Threat.
Geniole SN; Denson TF; Dixson BJ; Carré JM; McCormick CM
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132726. PubMed ID: 26181579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Face of a fighter: Bizygomatic width as a cue of formidability.
Zilioli S; Sell AN; Stirrat M; Jagore J; Vickerman W; Watson NV
Aggress Behav; 2015; 41(4):322-30. PubMed ID: 24910133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.
Dixson BJ; Sulikowski D; Gouda-Vossos A; Rantala MJ; Brooks RC
J Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 29(11):2311-2320. PubMed ID: 27488414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not.
Lefevre CE; Etchells PJ; Howell EC; Clark AP; Penton-Voak IS
Biol Lett; 2014 Oct; 10(10):20140729. PubMed ID: 25339656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Men's preferences for women's femininity in dynamic cross-modal stimuli.
O'Connor JJ; Fraccaro PJ; Pisanski K; Tigue CC; Feinberg DR
PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e69531. PubMed ID: 23936037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Men's facial width-to-height ratio predicts aggression: a meta-analysis.
Haselhuhn MP; Ormiston ME; Wong EM
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0122637. PubMed ID: 25849992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tracking sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio across the lifespan: implications for perceived aggressiveness.
Summersby S; Harris B; Denson TF; White D
R Soc Open Sci; 2022 May; 9(5):211500. PubMed ID: 35592758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. I Can Wear a Beard, but you Should Shave…Preferences for Men's Facial Hair From the Perspective of Both Sexes.
Jach Ł; Moroń M
Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(4):1474704920961728. PubMed ID: 33140655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Facing aggression: cues differ for female versus male faces.
Geniole SN; Keyes AE; Mondloch CJ; Carré JM; McCormick CM
PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e30366. PubMed ID: 22276184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Force versus fury: Sex differences in the relationships among physical and psychological threat potential, the facial width-to-height ratio, and judgements of aggressiveness.
MacDonell ET; Geniole SN; McCormick CM
Aggress Behav; 2018 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 29878380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mating Strategies and the Masculinity Paradox: How Relationship Context, Relationship Status, and Sociosexuality Shape Women's Preferences for Facial Masculinity and Beardedness.
Stower RE; Lee AJ; McIntosh TL; Sidari MJ; Sherlock JM; Dixson BJW
Arch Sex Behav; 2020 Apr; 49(3):809-820. PubMed ID: 31016490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Further evidence for links between facial width-to-height ratio and fighting success: Commentary on Zilioli et al. (2014).
Třebický V; Fialová J; Kleisner K; Roberts SC; Little AC; Havlíček J
Aggress Behav; 2015; 41(4):331-4. PubMed ID: 25236530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influences of observer sex, facial masculinity, and gender role identification on first impressions of men's faces.
Macapagal KR; Rupp HA; Heiman JR
J Soc Evol Cult Psychol; 2011 Jan; 5(1):92-105. PubMed ID: 21874151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior.
Carré JM; McCormick CM; Mondloch CJ
Psychol Sci; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1194-8. PubMed ID: 19686297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of income and testosterone on the validity of facial width-to-height ratio as a biomarker for dominance.
Noser E; Schoch J; Ehlert U
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207333. PubMed ID: 30412629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
