These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28261811)

  • 21. Pregnant Women's Preferences for Men's Faces Differ Significantly from Nonpregnant Women.
    Limoncin E; Ciocca G; Gravina GL; Carosa E; Mollaioli D; Cellerino A; Mennucci A; Di Sante S; Lenzi A; Jannini EA
    J Sex Med; 2015 May; 12(5):1142-51. PubMed ID: 25754377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women's preferences for direct gaze.
    Conway CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
    Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):109-21. PubMed ID: 19460236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of mating context and fecundability in women's preferences for men's facial masculinity and beardedness.
    Dixson BJW; Blake KR; Denson TF; Gooda-Vossos A; O'Dean SM; Sulikowski D; Rantala MJ; Brooks RC
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2018 Jul; 93():90-102. PubMed ID: 29705577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimating aggression from emotionally neutral faces: which facial cues are diagnostic?
    Carré JM; Morrissey MD; Mondloch CJ; McCormick CM
    Perception; 2010; 39(3):356-77. PubMed ID: 20465172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Social status moderates the relationship between facial structure and aggression.
    Goetz SM; Shattuck KS; Miller RM; Campbell JA; Lozoya E; Weisfeld GE; Carré JM
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Nov; 24(11):2329-34. PubMed ID: 24068116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. No evidence that partnered and unpartnered gay men differ in their preferences for male facial masculinity.
    Cassar R; Shiramizu V; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229133. PubMed ID: 32134936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Facial Width-To-Height Ratio (fWHR) Is Not Associated with Adolescent Testosterone Levels.
    Hodges-Simeon CR; Hanson Sobraske KN; Samore T; Gurven M; Gaulin SJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153083. PubMed ID: 27078636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Within-person variability in men's facial width-to-height ratio.
    Kramer RS
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1801. PubMed ID: 26989634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reading men's faces: women's mate attractiveness judgments track men's testosterone and interest in infants.
    Roney JR; Hanson KN; Durante KM; Maestripieri D
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Sep; 273(1598):2169-75. PubMed ID: 16901836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Correlated Preferences for Male Facial Masculinity and Partner Traits in Gay and Bisexual Men in China.
    Zheng L; Zheng Y
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Jul; 44(5):1423-30. PubMed ID: 25331614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women's Hormonal Status.
    Jones BC; Hahn AC; Fisher CI; Wang H; Kandrik M; Han C; Fasolt V; Morrison D; Lee AJ; Holzleitner IJ; O'Shea KJ; Roberts SC; Little AC; DeBruine LM
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Jun; 29(6):996-1005. PubMed ID: 29708849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Taking control of aggression: Perceptions of aggression suppress the link between perceptions of facial masculinity and attractiveness.
    Geniole SN; McCormick CM
    Evol Psychol; 2013 Nov; 11(5):1027-43. PubMed ID: 24192545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sociosexual orientation and 2D:4D ratios in women: Relationship to men's desirability ratings as a long-term pair bond.
    DeLecce TL; Polheber JP; Matchock RL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Feb; 43(2):319-27. PubMed ID: 24356948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Testosterone-dependent facial and body traits predict men's sociosexual attitudes and behaviors.
    Polo P; Muñoz-Reyes JA; Pita M; Shackelford TK; Fink B
    Am J Hum Biol; 2019 May; 31(3):e23235. PubMed ID: 30884051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The impact of facial emotional expressions and sex on interpersonal distancing as evaluated in a computerized stop-distance task.
    Miller HC; Chabriac AS; Molet M
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Sep; 67(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 23205511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mothers are sensitive to men's beards as a potential cue of paternal investment.
    Dixson BJW; Kennedy-Costantini S; Lee AJ; Nelson NL
    Horm Behav; 2019 Jul; 113():55-66. PubMed ID: 30978339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The face-time continuum: lifespan changes in facial width-to-height ratio impact aging-associated perceptions.
    Hehman E; Leitner JB; Freeman JB
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1624-36. PubMed ID: 25278108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Overgeneralizing emotions: Facial width-to-height revisited.
    Windmann S; Steinbrück L; Stier P
    Emotion; 2023 Feb; 23(1):163-181. PubMed ID: 34843306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Changes in salivary estradiol predict changes in women's preferences for vocal masculinity.
    Pisanski K; Hahn AC; Fisher CI; DeBruine LM; Feinberg DR; Jones BC
    Horm Behav; 2014 Aug; 66(3):493-7. PubMed ID: 25051294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Role of Facial and Body Hair Distribution in Women's Judgments of Men's Sexual Attractiveness.
    Dixson BJ; Rantala MJ
    Arch Sex Behav; 2016 May; 45(4):877-89. PubMed ID: 26292838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.