These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28261978)

  • 1. The cellularity yield of three different 22-gauge endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration needles.
    Othman MO; Abdelfatah MM; Padilla O; Hussinat M; Elhanafi S; Eloliby M; Torabi A; Hakim N; Boman DA
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 May; 45(5):426-432. PubMed ID: 28261978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 22-gauge core
    Sterlacci W; Sioulas AD; Veits L; Gönüllü P; Schachschal G; Groth S; Anders M; Kontos CK; Topalidis T; Hinsch A; Vieth M; Rösch T; Denzer UW
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8820-8830. PubMed ID: 27818598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative needle study: EUS-FNA procedures using the HD ProCore(™) and EchoTip(®) 22-gauge needle types.
    Witt BL; Adler DG; Hilden K; Layfield LJ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1069-74. PubMed ID: 23513000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
    van Riet PA; Larghi A; Attili F; Rindi G; Nguyen NQ; Ruszkiewicz A; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Aslanian H; Farrell J; Robert M; Adeniran A; Van Der Merwe S; Roskams T; Chang K; Lin F; Lee JG; Arcidiacono PG; Petrone M; Doglioni C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Abdulkader I; Giovannini M; Bories E; Poizat F; Santo E; Scapa E; Marmor S; Bucobo JC; Buscaglia JM; Heimann A; Wu M; Baldaque-Silva F; Moro CF; Erler NS; Biermann K; Poley JW; Cahen DL; Bruno MJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histologic diagnosis of pancreatic masses using 25-gauge endoscopic ultrasound needles with and without a core trap: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Kamata K; Kitano M; Yasukawa S; Kudo M; Chiba Y; Ogura T; Higuchi K; Fukutake N; Ashida R; Yamasaki T; Nebiki H; Hirose S; Hoki N; Asada M; Yazumi S; Takaoka M; Okazaki K; Matsuda F; Okabe Y; Yanagisawa A
    Endoscopy; 2016 Jul; 48(7):632-8. PubMed ID: 27129137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective evaluation of the optimal number of 25-gauge needle passes for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions in the absence of an onsite cytopathologist.
    Suzuki R; Irisawa A; Bhutani MS; Hikichi T; Takagi T; Sato A; Sato M; Ikeda T; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Tasaki K; Obara K; Ohira H
    Dig Endosc; 2012 Nov; 24(6):452-6. PubMed ID: 23078439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study.
    Rodrigues-Pinto E; Jalaj S; Grimm IS; Baron TH
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 27345131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Core needle versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study.
    Vanbiervliet G; Napoléon B; Saint Paul MC; Sakarovitch C; Wangermez M; Bichard P; Subtil C; Koch S; Grandval P; Gincul R; Karsenti D; Heyries L; Duchmann JC; Bourgaux JF; Levy M; Calament G; Fumex F; Pujol B; Lefort C; Poincloux L; Pagenault M; Bonin EA; Fabre M; Barthet M
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1063-70. PubMed ID: 25098612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions.
    Nayar MK; Paranandi B; Dawwas MF; Leeds JS; Darne A; Haugk B; Majumdar D; Ahmed MM; Oppong KW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 May; 85(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 27633157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions.
    Iwashita T; Nakai Y; Samarasena JB; Park DH; Zhang Z; Gu M; Lee JG; Chang KJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):909-15. PubMed ID: 23433596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blinded prospective comparison of the performance of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas and peri-pancreatic lesions.
    Lee JH; Stewart J; Ross WA; Anandasabapathy S; Xiao L; Staerkel G
    Dig Dis Sci; 2009 Oct; 54(10):2274-81. PubMed ID: 19669880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial.
    Itonaga M; Yasukawa S; Shimokawa T; Takenaka M; Fukutake N; Ogura T; Sakagami J; Shiomi H; Okura Y; Inatomi O; Matsumoto H; Kurita A; Suzuki A; Tanaka K; Kitano M
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):816. PubMed ID: 31888733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of the Standard 22-Gauge Needle and the New 20-Gauge Forward-Bevel Core Biopsy Needle for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition from Pancreatic Lesions.
    Fujie S; Ishiwatari H; Sasaki K; Sato J; Matsubayashi H; Yoshida M; Ito S; Kawata N; Imai K; Kakushima N; Takizawa K; Hotta K; Ono H
    Gut Liver; 2019 May; 13(3):349-355. PubMed ID: 30600677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses.
    Vilmann P; Săftoiu A; Hollerbach S; Skov BG; Linnemann D; Popescu CF; Wellmann A; Gorunescu F; Clementsen P; Freund U; Flemming P; Hassan H; Gheonea DI; Streba L; Ioncică AM; Streba CT
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jul; 48(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 23795663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
    Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Ramesh J; Varadarajulu S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 22658389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses.
    Minaga K; Yoshikawa T; Yamashita Y; Akamatsu H; Ikenouchi M; Ishii T; Matsumoto H; Iwagami H; Nakatani Y; Hatamaru K; Takenaka M; Akamatsu T; Uenoyama Y; Watanabe T; Ono K; Chiba Y; Kudo M
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Oct; 64(10):2982-2991. PubMed ID: 31011943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of a stylet on a histological specimen in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 22-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
    Abe Y; Kawakami H; Oba K; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Isayama H; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Nakashima M; Yamamoto N; Kuwatani M; Mitsuhashi T; Hasegawa T; Hirose Y; Yamada T; Tanaka M; Sakamoto N;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):837-844.e1. PubMed ID: 25936452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.