These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28262623)

  • 1. Second-generation magnesium scaffold Magmaris: device design and preclinical evaluation in a porcine coronary artery model.
    Waksman R; Zumstein P; Pritsch M; Wittchow E; Haude M; Lapointe-Corriveau C; Leclerc G; Joner M
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Jul; 13(4):440-449. PubMed ID: 28262623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of a Bioresorbable, Magnesium-Based Sirolimus-Eluting Stent with a Permanent, Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent for Treating Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: the PRAGUE-22 Study.
    Toušek P; Lazarák T; Varvařovský I; Nováčková M; Neuberg M; Kočka V
    Cardiovasc Drugs Ther; 2022 Dec; 36(6):1129-1136. PubMed ID: 34505954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intracoronary optical coherence tomography and histology of overlapping everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in a porcine coronary artery model: the potential implications for clinical practice.
    Farooq V; Serruys PW; Heo JH; Gogas BD; Onuma Y; Perkins LE; Diletti R; Radu MD; Räber L; Bourantas CV; Zhang Y; van Remortel E; Pawar R; Rapoza RJ; Powers JC; van Beusekom HM; Garcìa-Garcìa HM; Virmani R
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 May; 6(5):523-32. PubMed ID: 23702016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel Sirolimus-Eluting Iron Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold in Porcine Coronary Artery at 6 Months.
    Zheng JF; Qiu H; Tian Y; Hu XY; Luo T; Wu C; Tian Y; Tang Y; Song LF; Li L; Xu L; Xu B; Gao RL
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 12(3):245-255. PubMed ID: 30732729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Serial invasive imaging follow-up of the first clinical experience with the Magmaris magnesium bioresorbable scaffold.
    Tovar Forero MN; van Zandvoort L; Masdjedi K; Diletti R; Wilschut J; de Jaegere PP; Zijlstra F; Van Mieghem NM; Daemen J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 95(2):226-231. PubMed ID: 31033171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incidence and imaging outcomes of acute scaffold disruption and late structural discontinuity after implantation of the absorb Everolimus-Eluting fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold: optical coherence tomography assessment in the ABSORB cohort B Trial (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
    Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Muramatsu T; Nakatani S; van Geuns RJ; de Bruyne B; Dudek D; Christiansen E; Smits PC; Chevalier B; McClean D; Koolen J; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; Garcia-Garcia HM; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 7(12):1400-11. PubMed ID: 25523532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Acute Thrombogenicity for Metallic and Polymeric Bioabsorbable Scaffolds: Magmaris Versus Absorb in a Porcine Arteriovenous Shunt Model.
    Waksman R; Lipinski MJ; Acampado E; Cheng Q; Adams L; Torii S; Gai J; Torguson R; Hellinga DM; Westman PC; Joner M; Zumstein P; Kolodgie FD; Virmani R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 28801538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Head-to-head comparison of the neointimal response between metallic and bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffolds using optical coherence tomography.
    Gomez-Lara J; Brugaletta S; Farooq V; Onuma Y; Diletti R; Windecker S; Thuesen L; McClean D; Koolen J; Whitbourn R; Dudek D; Smits PC; Chevalier B; Regar E; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA; Garcia-Garcia HM; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Dec; 4(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 22192368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the second generation of a bioresorbable everolimus drug-eluting vascular scaffold for treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis: six-month clinical and imaging outcomes.
    Serruys PW; Onuma Y; Ormiston JA; de Bruyne B; Regar E; Dudek D; Thuesen L; Smits PC; Chevalier B; McClean D; Koolen J; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; Dorange C; Veldhof S; Miquel-Hebert K; Rapoza R; García-García HM
    Circulation; 2010 Nov; 122(22):2301-12. PubMed ID: 21098436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparable vascular response of a new generation sirolimus eluting stents when compared to fluoropolymer everolimus eluting stents in the porcine coronary restenosis model.
    Buszman PP; Michalak MJ; Pruski M; Fernandez C; Jelonek M; Janas A; Savard C; Gwiazdowska-Nowotka B; Żurakowski A; Wojakowski W; Buszman PE; Milewski K
    Cardiol J; 2016; 23(6):657-666. PubMed ID: 27976797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is quantitative coronary angiography reliable in assessing the late lumen loss of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable polylactide scaffold in comparison with the cobalt-chromium metallic stent?
    Sotomi Y; Onuma Y; Miyazaki Y; Asano T; Katagiri Y; Tenekecioglu E; Jonker H; Dijkstra J; de Winter RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; Stone GW; Popma JJ; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Serruys PW; Kimura T
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Aug; 13(5):e585-e594. PubMed ID: 28262625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. First-in-human evaluation of a bioabsorbable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent: imaging and clinical results of the DESSOLVE I Trial (DES with sirolimus and a bioabsorbable polymer for the treatment of patients with de novo lesion in the native coronary arteries).
    Ormiston J; Webster M; Stewart J; Vrolix M; Whitbourn R; Donohoe D; Knape C; Lansky A; Attizzani GF; Fitzgerald P; Kandzari DE; Wijns W
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1026-34. PubMed ID: 24055443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries.
    Tamburino C; Capranzano P; Gori T; Latib A; Lesiak M; Nef H; Caramanno G; Naber C; Mehilli J; Di Mario C; Sabaté M; Münzel T; Colombo A; Araszkiewicz A; Wiebe J; Geraci S; Jensen C; Mattesini A; Brugaletta S; Capodanno D
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 9(5):440-9. PubMed ID: 26875648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arterial healing following primary PCI using the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS) versus the durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent (XIENCE) in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the randomised TROFI II study.
    Räber L; Onuma Y; Brugaletta S; Garcia-Garcia HM; Backx B; Iñiguez A; Okkels Jensen L; Cequier-Fillat À; Pilgrim T; Christiansen EH; Hofma SH; Suttorp M; Serruys PW; Sabaté M; Windecker S
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Jul; 12(4):482-9. PubMed ID: 26342471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term safety of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold and the cobalt-chromium XIENCE V stent in a porcine coronary artery model.
    Otsuka F; Pacheco E; Perkins LE; Lane JP; Wang Q; Kamberi M; Frie M; Wang J; Sakakura K; Yahagi K; Ladich E; Rapoza RJ; Kolodgie FD; Virmani R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jun; 7(3):330-42. PubMed ID: 24895447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A head to head comparison of XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold versus metallic sirolimus-eluting stent: 180 days follow-up in a porcine model.
    Shen L; Wu Y; Ge L; Zhang Y; Wang Q; Qian J; Qiu Z; Ge J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 33(10):1473-1481. PubMed ID: 28639098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early outcome of magnesium bioresorbable scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndrome-the initial report from the Magmaris-ACS registry.
    Wlodarczak A; Lanocha M; Jastrzebski A; Pecherzewski M; Szudrowicz M; Jastrzebski W; Nawrot J; Lesiak M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 93(5):E287-E292. PubMed ID: 30537203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical properties of the drug-eluting bioresorbable magnesium scaffold compared with polymeric scaffolds and a permanent metallic drug-eluting stent.
    Barkholt TØ; Webber B; Holm NR; Ormiston JA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Dec; 96(7):E674-E682. PubMed ID: 31710149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety and performance of the second-generation drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold in patients with de-novo coronary artery lesions (BIOSOLVE-II): 6 month results of a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, first-in-man trial.
    Haude M; Ince H; Abizaid A; Toelg R; Lemos PA; von Birgelen C; Christiansen EH; Wijns W; Neumann FJ; Kaiser C; Eeckhout E; Lim ST; Escaned J; Garcia-Garcia HM; Waksman R
    Lancet; 2016 Jan; 387(10013):31-9. PubMed ID: 26470647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ABSORB II randomized controlled trial: a clinical evaluation to compare the safety, efficacy, and performance of the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold system against the XIENCE everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of subjects with ischemic heart disease caused by de novo native coronary artery lesions: rationale and study design.
    Diletti R; Serruys PW; Farooq V; Sudhir K; Dorange C; Miquel-Hebert K; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Onuma Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; Chevalier B
    Am Heart J; 2012 Nov; 164(5):654-63. PubMed ID: 23137495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.