These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28263088)

  • 1. Active learning for computational chemogenomics.
    Reker D; Schneider P; Schneider G; Brown JB
    Future Med Chem; 2017 Mar; 9(4):381-402. PubMed ID: 28263088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Applicability Domain of Active Learning in Chemical Probe Identification: Convergence in Learning from Non-Specific Compounds and Decision Rule Clarification.
    Polash AH; Nakano T; Takeda S; Brown JB
    Molecules; 2019 Jul; 24(15):. PubMed ID: 31357419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A chemogenomics view on protein-ligand spaces.
    Strömbergsson H; Kleywegt GJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jun; 10 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S13. PubMed ID: 19534738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Future of Computational Chemogenomics.
    Jacoby E; Brown JB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1825():425-450. PubMed ID: 30334216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational chemogenomics: is it more than inductive transfer?
    Brown JB; Okuno Y; Marcou G; Varnek A; Horvath D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Jun; 28(6):597-618. PubMed ID: 24771144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection of Informative Examples in Chemogenomic Datasets.
    Reker D; Brown JB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1825():369-410. PubMed ID: 30334214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linear and Kernel Model Construction Methods for Predicting Drug-Target Interactions in a Chemogenomic Framework.
    Yamanishi Y
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1825():355-368. PubMed ID: 30334213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative chemogenomics: machine-learning models of protein-ligand interaction.
    Andersson CR; Gustafsson MG; Strömbergsson H
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2011; 11(15):1978-93. PubMed ID: 21470169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Structural Framework for GPCR Chemogenomics: What's In a Residue Number?
    Vass M; Kooistra AJ; Verhoeven S; Gloriam D; de Esch IJP; de Graaf C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():73-113. PubMed ID: 29188559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computational methodologies for compound database searching that utilize experimental protein-ligand interaction information.
    Tan L; Batista J; Bajorath J
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2010 Sep; 76(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 20636330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparative Assessment of Predictive Accuracies of Conventional and Machine Learning Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(2):335-47. PubMed ID: 26357221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Machine learning models for drug-target interactions: current knowledge and future directions.
    D'Souza S; Prema KV; Balaji S
    Drug Discov Today; 2020 Apr; 25(4):748-756. PubMed ID: 32171918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Molecular interaction fingerprint approaches for GPCR drug discovery.
    Vass M; Kooistra AJ; Ritschel T; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
    Curr Opin Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 30():59-68. PubMed ID: 27479316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. TargetHunter: an in silico target identification tool for predicting therapeutic potential of small organic molecules based on chemogenomic database.
    Wang L; Ma C; Wipf P; Liu H; Su W; Xie XQ
    AAPS J; 2013 Apr; 15(2):395-406. PubMed ID: 23292636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SABRE: ligand/structure-based virtual screening approach using consensus molecular-shape pattern recognition.
    Wei NN; Hamza A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):338-46. PubMed ID: 24328054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational chemical biology on the rise.
    Brown JB; Bajorath J
    Future Med Chem; 2019 Jan; 11(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 30526065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chemogenomic Active Learning's Domain of Applicability on Small, Sparse qHTS Matrices: A Study Using Cytochrome P450 and Nuclear Hormone Receptor Families.
    Rakers C; Najnin RA; Polash AH; Takeda S; Brown JB
    ChemMedChem; 2018 Mar; 13(6):511-521. PubMed ID: 29211346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting kinase inhibitors using bioactivity matrix derived informer sets.
    Zhang H; Ericksen SS; Lee CP; Ananiev GE; Wlodarchak N; Yu P; Mitchell JC; Gitter A; Wright SJ; Hoffmann FM; Wildman SA; Newton MA
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Aug; 15(8):e1006813. PubMed ID: 31381559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of deep and shallow learning methods in chemogenomics for the prediction of drugs specificity.
    Playe B; Stoven V
    J Cheminform; 2020 Feb; 12(1):11. PubMed ID: 33431042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.