224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28263199)
1. Hysteropexy: Evidence and Insights.
Ridgeway BM; Cadish L
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 60(2):312-323. PubMed ID: 28263199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the uterus need to be removed to correct uterovaginal prolapse?
Gutman RE
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 27467823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hysteropexy: an Option for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Bradley S; Gutman RE; Richter LA
Curr Urol Rep; 2018 Feb; 19(2):15. PubMed ID: 29476274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol).
van IJsselmuiden MN; Coolen AL; Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Bongers M; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Deprest J; van Eijndhoven HW
BMC Womens Health; 2014 Sep; 14():112. PubMed ID: 25231240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse.
Ridgeway BM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 213(6):802-9. PubMed ID: 26226554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of Hysteropexy in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Gan ZS; Roberson DS; Smith AL
Curr Urol Rep; 2022 Sep; 23(9):175-183. PubMed ID: 35789456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence-Based Review of Vaginal Native Tissue Hysteropexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse.
Hoke TP; Tan-Kim J; Richter HE
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2019 Jul; 74(7):429-435. PubMed ID: 31343708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy: a retrospective feasibility study.
Milani R; Frigerio M; Manodoro S; Cola A; Spelzini F
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jan; 28(1):73-76. PubMed ID: 27193162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).
Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.
Kapoor S; Sivanesan K; Robertson JA; Veerasingham M; Kapoor V
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1285-1294. PubMed ID: 28258346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Suture Sacrohysteropexy: LUSSH Procedure.
Jan H; Ghai V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):356-357. PubMed ID: 29631010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as primary surgical treatment for a descensus uteri: effects on urinary symptoms.
van Brummen HJ; van de Pol G; Aalders CI; Heintz AP; van der Vaart CH
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2003 Nov; 14(5):350-5; discussion 355. PubMed ID: 14618315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uterus-Sparing Surgery: Outcomes of Transvaginal Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy.
Aserlind A; Garcia AN; Medina CA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 32387566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pregnancy outcomes after transvaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy.
Cavkaytar S; Kokanalı MK; Tasdemir U; Doganay M; Aksakal O
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Sep; 216():204-207. PubMed ID: 28802943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trends in Hysteropexy and Apical Support for Uterovaginal Prolapse in the United States from 2002 to 2012.
Madsen AM; Raker C; Sung VW
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(6):365-371. PubMed ID: 28723720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
