183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28263689)
1. Comparison of Breast Cancer Risk Predictive Models and Screening Strategies for Chinese Women.
Zhao Y; Xiong P; McCullough LE; Miller EE; Li H; Huang Y; Zhao M; Wang MJ; Kang M; Wang Q; Li JY
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 Mar; 26(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 28263689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Accuracy and direct medical cost of different screening modalities for breast cancer among Chinese women].
Kang M; Zhao Y; Huang Y; Li J; Liu L; Li H
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 36(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 24785288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Compliance with screening recommendations according to breast cancer risk levels in Izmir, Turkey.
Acikgoz A; Ergor G
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(3):1737-42. PubMed ID: 23679266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preliminary investigation of mammographic density among women in Riyadh: association with breast cancer risk factors and implications for screening practices.
Albeshan SM; Hossain SZ; Mackey MG; Peat JK; Al Tahan FM; Brennan PC
Clin Imaging; 2019; 54():138-147. PubMed ID: 30639525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evolution of breast cancer screening in countries with intermediate and increasing incidence of breast cancer.
Wu GH; Chen LS; Chang KJ; Hou MF; Chen SC; Liu TJ; Huang CS; Hsu GC; Yu CC; Jeng LL; Chen ST; Chou YH; Wu CY; Shin-Lan K; Chen TH;
J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S23-7. PubMed ID: 17227638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening MRI in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
Lehman CD; Lee JM; DeMartini WB; Hippe DS; Rendi MH; Kalish G; Porter P; Gralow J; Partridge SC
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Mar; 108(3):. PubMed ID: 26744477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammographic breast density and the Gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population.
Tice JA; Cummings SR; Ziv E; Kerlikowske K
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Nov; 94(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 16261410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer].
Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-national comparison of screening mammography accuracy measures in U.S., Norway, and Spain.
Domingo L; Hofvind S; Hubbard RA; Román M; Benkeser D; Sala M; Castells X
Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2520-8. PubMed ID: 26560729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and evaluation of the screening performance of a low-cost high-risk screening strategy for breast cancer.
Huang Y; Wang H; Lyu Z; Dai H; Liu P; Zhu Y; Song F; Chen K
Cancer Biol Med; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1375-84. PubMed ID: 34570443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of organized mammography screening on breast cancer mortality: A population-based cohort study in Norway.
Møller MH; Lousdal ML; Kristiansen IS; Støvring H
Int J Cancer; 2019 Feb; 144(4):697-706. PubMed ID: 30144028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast cancer screening practices among Hong Kong Chinese women.
Kwok C; Fong DY
Cancer Nurs; 2014; 37(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 23357890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammography performance in Oman: Review of factors influencing cancer yield and positive predictive value.
Taif S; Tufail F; Alnuaimi AS
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 12(2):e250-8. PubMed ID: 24673798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A cross sectional study on the motivators for Asian women to attend opportunistic mammography screening in a private hospital in Malaysia: the MyMammo study.
Hassan N; Ho WK; Mariapun S; Teo SH
BMC Public Health; 2015 Jun; 15():548. PubMed ID: 26065413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adherence characteristics after abnormal screening results between mammogram and Papanicolaou test groups.
Fang SY; Shu BC
Cancer Nurs; 2009; 32(6):437-45. PubMed ID: 19816157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
