These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28263734)

  • 1. Comparison of Axial Length, Corneal Curvature, and Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements of 2 Recently Introduced Devices to a Known Biometer.
    Shajari M; Cremonese C; Petermann K; Singh P; Müller M; Kohnen T
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 178():58-64. PubMed ID: 28263734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer.
    Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements.
    Sel S; Stange J; Kaiser D; Kiraly L
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):318-322. PubMed ID: 28342729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeatability and agreement of swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry biometers in myopes.
    Garcia Ardoy E; Mateos N; Roda L; Torrado Sierra O; Baptista AM; Serra PM
    Clin Exp Optom; 2023 Sep; 106(7):783-792. PubMed ID: 36508569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two novel swept-source optical coherence tomography devices to a partial coherence interferometry-based biometer.
    Chan TCY; Yu MCY; Chiu V; Lai G; Leung CKS; Chan PPM
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14853. PubMed ID: 34290281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeatability and Agreement of a Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometer IOLMaster 700 Versus a Scheimpflug Imaging-Based Biometer AL-Scan in Cataract Patients.
    Chan TCY; Wan KH; Tang FY; Wang YM; Yu M; Cheung C
    Eye Contact Lens; 2020 Jan; 46(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 30985487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Kunert KS; Peter M; Blum M; Haigis W; Sekundo W; Schütze J; Büehren T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26948781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of axial length using a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer - ARGOS with partial coherence interferometry- based biometer -IOLMaster among school children.
    Hussaindeen JR; Mariam EG; Arunachalam S; Bhavatharini R; Gopalakrishnan A; Narayanan A; Agarkar S; Sivaraman V
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209356. PubMed ID: 30589874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Agreement Between Two Optical Biometers Based on Large Coherence Length SS-OCT and Scheimpflug Imaging/Partial Coherence Interferometry.
    Tu R; Yu J; Savini G; Ye J; Ning R; Xiong J; Chen S; Huang J
    J Refract Surg; 2020 Jul; 36(7):459-465. PubMed ID: 32644168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China.
    Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the Validity of Measurements of Swept-source and Partial Coherence Interferometry Devices in Cataract Patients.
    Ghaffari R; Mahmoudzadeh R; Mohammadi SS; Salabati M; Latifi G; Ghassemi H
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):745-750. PubMed ID: 31592957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison study of the axial length measured using the new swept-source optical coherence tomography ANTERION and the partial coherence interferometry IOL Master.
    Kim KY; Choi GS; Kang MS; Kim US
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244590. PubMed ID: 33382814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non-contact biometric devices in myopes.
    Zhao J; Chen Z; Zhou Z; Ding L; Zhou X
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22943766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer.
    Shammas HJ; Ortiz S; Shammas MC; Kim SH; Chong C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 26948778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the ultrasonographic method with 2 partial coherence interferometry methods for intraocular lens power calculation.
    Salouti R; Nowroozzadeh MH; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Salouti R
    Optometry; 2011 Mar; 82(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 20933477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of a new Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometer and a low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
    Ruiz-Mesa R; Abengózar-Vela A; Ruiz-Santos M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1406-1412. PubMed ID: 29223229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The repeatability and agreement of biometric measurements by dual Scheimpflug device with integrated optical biometer.
    Hashemi H; Sardari S; Yekta A; Khabazkhoob M
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):7748. PubMed ID: 35546610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement agreement between a new biometer based on partial coherence interferometry and a validated biometer based on optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Li J; Chen H; Savini G; Lu W; Yu X; Bao F; Wang Q; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 26948780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repeatability and reproducibility of a new fully automatic measurement optical low coherence reflectometry biometer and agreement with swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer.
    Yu J; Zhao G; Lei CS; Wan T; Ning R; Xing W; Ma X; Pan H; Savini G; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Zhou X; Huang J
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 108(5):673-678. PubMed ID: 37142332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.