169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28263816)
1. Cases in which ancestral maximum likelihood will be confusingly misleading.
Handelman T; Chor B
J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 420():318-323. PubMed ID: 28263816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shrinkage effect in ancestral maximum likelihood.
Mossel E; Roch S; Steel M
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(1):126-33. PubMed ID: 19179706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods.
Yang Z
J Mol Evol; 1996 Feb; 42(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 8919881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Approximate maximum parsimony and ancestral maximum likelihood.
Alon N; Chor B; Pardi F; Rapoport A
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2010; 7(1):183-7. PubMed ID: 20150680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Large sample approximations of probabilities of correct evolutionary tree estimation and biases of maximum likelihood estimation.
Susko E
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2011; 10():Article 10. PubMed ID: 21381435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ancestral state reconstruction with large numbers of sequences and edge-length estimation.
Ho LST; Susko E
J Math Biol; 2022 Feb; 84(4):21. PubMed ID: 35188616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outgroup misplacement and phylogenetic inaccuracy under a molecular clock--a simulation study.
Holland BR; Penny D; Hendy MD
Syst Biol; 2003 Apr; 52(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 12746148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consistency and inconsistency of consensus methods for inferring species trees from gene trees in the presence of ancestral population structure.
DeGiorgio M; Rosenberg NA
Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Aug; 110():12-24. PubMed ID: 27086043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracies of ancestral amino acid sequences inferred by the parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.
Zhang J; Nei M
J Mol Evol; 1997; 44 Suppl 1():S139-46. PubMed ID: 9071022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quartet-mapping, a generalization of the likelihood-mapping procedure.
Nieselt-Struwe K; von Haeseler A
Mol Biol Evol; 2001 Jul; 18(7):1204-19. PubMed ID: 11420361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. When being "most likely" is not enough: examining the performance of three uses of the parametric bootstrap in phylogenetics.
Antezana M
J Mol Evol; 2003 Feb; 56(2):198-222. PubMed ID: 12574867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
Sourdis J; Nei M
Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 3386530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Most Parsimonious Likelihood Exhibits Multiple Optima for Compatible Characters.
Matsieva J; St John K
Bull Math Biol; 2020 Jan; 82(1):10. PubMed ID: 31932987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The optimization principle in phylogenetic analysis tends to give incorrect topologies when the number of nucleotides or amino acids used is small.
Nei M; Kumar S; Takahashi K
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Oct; 95(21):12390-7. PubMed ID: 9770497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny.
Russo CA; Takezaki N; Nei M
Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Mar; 13(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 8742641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data.
Lewis PO
Syst Biol; 2001; 50(6):913-25. PubMed ID: 12116640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Choosing the best ancestral character state reconstruction method.
Royer-Carenzi M; Pontarotti P; Didier G
Math Biosci; 2013 Mar; 242(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 23276531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Addressing the shortcomings of three recent Bayesian methods for detecting interspecific recombination in DNA sequence alignments.
Husmeier D; Mantzaris AV
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article 34. PubMed ID: 19049490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distances that perfectly mislead.
Huson DH; Steel M
Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):327-32. PubMed ID: 15205056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
