These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses. Brok J; Thorlund K; Gluud C; Wetterslev J J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):763-9. PubMed ID: 18411040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive--Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses. Brok J; Thorlund K; Wetterslev J; Gluud C Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):287-98. PubMed ID: 18824466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses on interventions in critical care may be inconclusive-a meta-epidemiological study. Koster TM; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Jakobsen JC; Kaufmann T; Eck RJ; Koster G; Hiemstra B; van der Horst ICC; Keus E J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 114():1-10. PubMed ID: 31200004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods. Jakobsen JC; Wetterslev J; Winkel P; Lange T; Gluud C BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Nov; 14():120. PubMed ID: 25416419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Random error in cardiovascular meta-analyses: how common are false positive and false negative results? AlBalawi Z; McAlister FA; Thorlund K; Wong M; Wetterslev J Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):1102-7. PubMed ID: 23218569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic reviews of randomised clinical trials examining the effects of psychotherapeutic interventions versus "no intervention" for acute major depressive disorder and a randomised trial examining the effects of "third wave" cognitive therapy versus mentalization-based treatment for acute major depressive disorder. Jakobsen JC Dan Med J; 2014 Oct; 61(10):B4942. PubMed ID: 25283628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed. Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 20004553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Major mistakes or errors in the use of trial sequential analysis in systematic reviews or meta-analyses - the METSA systematic review. Riberholt CG; Olsen MH; Milan JB; Hafliðadóttir SH; Svanholm JH; Pedersen EB; Lew CCH; Asante MA; Pereira Ribeiro J; Wagner V; Kumburegama BWMB; Lee ZY; Schaug JP; Madsen C; Gluud C BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Sep; 24(1):196. PubMed ID: 39251912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis. Wetterslev J; Thorlund K; Brok J; Gluud C J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 61(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 18083463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives. Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On adaptive error spending approach for group sequential trials with random information levels. Liu Q; Lim P; Nuamah I; Li Y J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):687-99. PubMed ID: 22651109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. False-positive findings in Cochrane meta-analyses with and without application of trial sequential analysis: an empirical review. Imberger G; Thorlund K; Gluud C; Wetterslev J BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011890. PubMed ID: 27519923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses. Wetterslev J; Thorlund K; Brok J; Gluud C BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Dec; 9():86. PubMed ID: 20042080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic reviews with meta-analysis of clinical trials: Is there enough evidence? Garcia-Alamino JM; Lopez-Cano M Cir Esp (Engl Ed); 2020 Jan; 98(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 31623821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incorporation of sequential trials into a fixed effects meta-analysis. Todd S Stat Med; 1997 Dec; 16(24):2915-25. PubMed ID: 9483723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increased risks for random errors are common in outcomes graded as high certainty of evidence. Gartlehner G; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Wagner G; Patel S; Swinson-Evans T; Dobrescu A; Gluud C J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():50-59. PubMed ID: 30342970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]