These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28265864)

  • 1. A diffusion decision model analysis of evidence variability in the lexical decision task.
    Tillman G; Osth AF; van Ravenzwaaij D; Heathcote A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1949-1956. PubMed ID: 28265864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task.
    Wagenmakers EJ; Steyvers M; Raaijmakers JG; Shiffrin RM; van Rijn H; Zeelenberg R
    Cogn Psychol; 2004 May; 48(3):332-67. PubMed ID: 15020215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.
    Balota DA; Chumbley JI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Jun; 10(3):340-57. PubMed ID: 6242411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory.
    Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ; Raoul A; Kaye M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 29683706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task.
    Ratcliff R; Gomez P; McKoon G
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jan; 111(1):159-82. PubMed ID: 14756592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task.
    Gerhand S; Barry C
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jul; 27(4):592-602. PubMed ID: 10479818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the limits of familiarity accounts in lexical decision: The case of repetition effects.
    Perea M; Marcet A; Vergara-Martínez M; Gomez P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Mar; 73(3):375-383. PubMed ID: 31552796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond the initial 140 ms, lexical decision and reading aloud are different tasks: An ERP study with topographic analysis.
    Mahé G; Zesiger P; Laganaro M
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 122():65-72. PubMed ID: 26244274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Putting it all together: a unified account of word recognition and reaction-time distributions.
    Norris D
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):207-19. PubMed ID: 19159154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2.
    Brysbaert M; Stevens M; Mandera P; Keuleers E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Mar; 42(3):441-58. PubMed ID: 26501839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Cortese MJ; Watson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1324-44. PubMed ID: 17154775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition.
    Kellas G; Ferraro FR; Simpson GB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Nov; 14(4):601-9. PubMed ID: 2974871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-Word Recognition Need Not Depend on Single-Word Features: Narrative Coherence Counteracts Effects of Single-Word Features that Lexical Decision Emphasizes.
    Teng DW; Wallot S; Kelty-Stephen DG
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1451-1472. PubMed ID: 26861216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orthographic neighborhood and concreteness effects in the lexical decision task.
    Samson D; Pillon A
    Brain Lang; 2004 Nov; 91(2):252-64. PubMed ID: 15485714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some neurophysiological constraints on models of word naming.
    Binder JR; Medler DA; Desai R; Conant LL; Liebenthal E
    Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):677-93. PubMed ID: 15921937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks.
    Piercey CD; Joordens S
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):657-66. PubMed ID: 10946548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian model for implicit effects in perceptual identification.
    Schooler LJ; Shiffrin RM; Raaijmakers JG
    Psychol Rev; 2001 Jan; 108(1):257-72. PubMed ID: 11212629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of affect and frequency on lexical decision: the role of the amygdala and inferior frontal cortex.
    Nakic M; Smith BW; Busis S; Vythilingam M; Blair RJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(4):1752-61. PubMed ID: 16647271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reading in a deep orthography: neuromagnetic evidence for dual-mechanisms.
    Wilson TW; Leuthold AC; Moran JE; Pardo PJ; Lewis SM; Georgopoulos AP
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 180(2):247-62. PubMed ID: 17256164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.