These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28266083)

  • 1. Genomic and single-step evaluations of carcass traits of young bulls in dual-purpose cattle.
    Croué I; Ducrocq V
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Aug; 134(4):300-307. PubMed ID: 28266083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of conventional BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP evaluations for yearling weight and carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using single trait and multi-trait models.
    Mehrban H; Lee DH; Naserkheil M; Moradi MH; Ibáñez-Escriche N
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223352. PubMed ID: 31609979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Carcass traits of young bulls in dual-purpose cattle: genetic parameters and genetic correlations with veal calf, type and production traits.
    Croué I; Fouilloux MN; Saintilan R; Ducrocq V
    Animal; 2017 Jun; 11(6):929-937. PubMed ID: 27819213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
    Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
    Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
    Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
    Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins.
    Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models.
    Karoui S; Carabaño MJ; Díaz C; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Dec; 44(1):39. PubMed ID: 23216664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
    Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of methods for the implementation of genome-assisted evaluation of Spanish dairy cattle.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):625-34. PubMed ID: 23102955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing bias in the dairy cattle single-step genomic evaluation by ignoring bulls without progeny.
    Koivula M; Strandén I; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Apr; 135(2):107-115. PubMed ID: 29484731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic evaluation of carcass traits of Korean beef cattle Hanwoo using a single-step marker effect model.
    Koo Y; Alkhoder H; Choi TJ; Liu Z; Reents R
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37004242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of single step genomic BLUP under different uncertain paternity scenarios using simulated data.
    Tonussi RL; Silva RMO; Magalhães AFB; Espigolan R; Peripolli E; Olivieri BF; Feitosa FLB; Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Chiaia HLJ; Pereira ASC; Lôbo RB; Bezerra LAF; Magnabosco CU; Lourenço DAL; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0181752. PubMed ID: 28957330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of genomic predictions for harvest and carcass weight in channel catfish.
    Garcia ALS; Bosworth B; Waldbieser G; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):66. PubMed ID: 30547740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Domestic estimated breeding values and genomic enhanced breeding values of bulls in comparison with their foreign genomic enhanced breeding values.
    Přibyl J; Bauer J; Čermák V; Pešek P; Přibylová J; Šplíchal J; Vostrá-Vydrová H; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L
    Animal; 2015 Oct; 9(10):1635-42. PubMed ID: 26133272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single step genomic evaluation for female fertility in Nordic Red dairy cattle.
    Matilainen K; Strandén I; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Oct; 135(5):337-348. PubMed ID: 30112802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accounting for genomic pre-selection in national BLUP evaluations in dairy cattle.
    Patry C; Ducrocq V
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Aug; 43(1):30. PubMed ID: 21851619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.