These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28266686)

  • 1. [Rehabilitation of an erosively worn dentition with direct adhesive restorations.].
    Attin T; Tauböck TT
    Swiss Dent J; 2017; 127(2):131-143. PubMed ID: 28266686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-year evaluation of posterior vertical bite reconstruction using direct resin composite--a case series.
    Schmidlin PR; Filli T; Imfeld C; Tepper S; Attin T
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 19192844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Posterior Vertical Bite Reconstructions of Erosively Worn Dentitions and the "Stamp Technique" - A Case Series with a Mean Observation Time of 40 Months.
    Ramseyer ST; Helbling C; Lussi A
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Jun; 17(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 26159125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conservative treatment of the worn dentition with adhesive composite resin.
    Strassler HE; Serio CL
    Dent Today; 2004 Aug; 23(8):79-80, 82-3; quiz 83. PubMed ID: 15354711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in cut non-retentive preparations and pre-existing cervical erosion/abrasion lesions.
    Kaplan I; Harris EF; Mincer HH; Gilpatrick RO
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1993 Apr; 73(2):24-8. PubMed ID: 8309244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment of localized anterior tooth wear with a glass-fiber-reinforced composite resin: a clinical report.
    Akar GC; Dundar M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 97(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 17394910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comprehensive and conservative approach for the restoration of abrasion and erosion. part II: clinical procedures and case report.
    Dietschi D; Argente A
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2011; 6(2):142-59. PubMed ID: 21734964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The etiology and treatment of cervical erosion.
    Brackett WW
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1994 Jul; 74(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 9520744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Restorations of eroded areas.
    Mount GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Jan; 120(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 2404041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive intervention in a case of a noncarious lesion and severe loss of tooth structure.
    Reston EG; Corba VD; Broliato G; Saldini BP; Stefanello Busato AL
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 22335303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Restoring the worn dentition.
    Ibsen RL; Ouellet DF
    J Esthet Dent; 1992; 4(3):96-101. PubMed ID: 1389355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A 3-year evaluation of Gluma and Gluma/Scotchbond for restoration of cervical erosions.
    van Dijken JW
    Scand J Dent Res; 1990 Aug; 98(4):341-4. PubMed ID: 2119052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evaluation of direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition - clinical performance and patient satisfaction.
    Poyser NJ; Briggs PF; Chana HS; Kelleher MG; Porter RW; Patel MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 May; 34(5):361-76. PubMed ID: 17441877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultraconservative resin restorations. "Watch and wait" is not acceptable treatment.
    Freedman G; Goldstep F; Seif T
    Dent Today; 2000 Jan; 19(1):66-8, 70-3. PubMed ID: 12523243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of cervical composite resin restorations placed without retention.
    Ziemiecki TL; Dennison JB; Charbeneau GT
    Oper Dent; 1987; 12(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 3547347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adhesive Class VI Resin Composite Restorations of Worn Mandibular Incisal Edges: A Two-year Case Report.
    Brackett MG; Wu J; Bachand WR; Brackett WW
    Oper Dent; 2023 Jan; 48(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 36445956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The survival of direct composite restorations in the management of severe tooth wear including attrition and erosion: A prospective 8-year study.
    Milosevic A; Burnside G
    J Dent; 2016 Jan; 44():13-9. PubMed ID: 26542166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Esthetic conservative restoration of cervical erosion.
    Jordan RE; Balanko M
    J Esthet Dent; 1990; 2(3):74-8. PubMed ID: 2134004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.