These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28266686)

  • 41. 3-year clinical evaluation of modified Gluma adhesive systems in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions.
    Hörsted-Bindslev P; Knudsen J; Baelum V
    Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 9002810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Contemporary management of minimal invasive aesthetic treatment of dentition affected by erosion: case report.
    Boitelle P
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31226976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Microleakage of incremental versus compression matrix bulk filling of cervical resin composite restorations.
    Mangum FI; Berry EA; DeSchepper E; Rieger MR
    Gen Dent; 1994; 42(4):304-8; quiz 317-8. PubMed ID: 7835667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A clinical evaluation of a resin-modified. Glass ionomer restorative material.
    Barnes DM; Blank LW; Gingell JC; Gilner PP
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Sep; 126(9):1245-53. PubMed ID: 7560584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Case report: the use of indirect composite for the management of extensive erosion.
    Briggs P; Bishop K; Kelleher M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Dec; 3(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 8605502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A technique for placing multiple composite restorations.
    Talbot TR
    Restorative Dent; 1985 Jan; 1(3):83-4, 86. PubMed ID: 3857697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions.
    Peumans M; Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 16324142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Adhesive restorations, centric relation, and the Dahl principle: minimally invasive approaches to localized anterior tooth erosion.
    Magne P; Magne M; Belser UC
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2007; 2(3):260-73. PubMed ID: 19655550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A comparative analysis of techniques of restoring cervical lesions.
    Sidhu SK
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Aug; 24(8):553-9. PubMed ID: 8272493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Adhesive techniques in the treatment of tooth wear due to bruxism].
    Roeters J; Stel M
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2000 Jul; 107(7):308-11. PubMed ID: 11385788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A clinical case involving severe erosion of the maxillary anterior teeth restored with direct composite resin restorations.
    Sethi S
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2016; 11(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 27092355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Restoration of a cervical lesion: etiology and factors affecting technique.
    Trushkowsky RD
    Dent Today; 1994 May; 13(5):82, 84-7. PubMed ID: 9540608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A comprehensive and conservative approach for the restoration of abrasion and erosion. Part I: concepts and clinical rationale for early intervention using adhesive techniques.
    Dietschi D; Argente A
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2011; 6(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 21403925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of EDTA conditioning on cervical restorations bonded with a self-etch adhesive: A randomized double-blind clinical trial.
    Luque-Martinez I; Muñoz MA; Mena-Serrano A; Hass V; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    J Dent; 2015 Sep; 43(9):1175-1183. PubMed ID: 25963586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Non-carious cervical tooth loss. Part 2: Management.
    Yap AU; Neo JC
    Dent Update; 1995 Nov; 22(9):364-8. PubMed ID: 8948224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Composite vertical bite reconstructions in eroded dentitions after 5·5 years: a case series.
    Attin T; Filli T; Imfeld C; Schmidlin PR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2012 Jan; 39(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 21827523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An up to 3-year randomized clinical study comparing indirect and direct resin composites used to restore worn posterior teeth.
    Bartlett D; Sundaram G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):613-7. PubMed ID: 17165303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
    Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Brackett MG
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11203770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Minimally Invasive Adhesive Rehabilitation for a Patient With Tooth Erosion: Seven-year Follow-up.
    Pini NP; De Marchi LM; Ramos AL; Pascotto RC
    Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):E45-E57. PubMed ID: 30142039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Re-anatomization of anterior eroded teeth by stratification with direct composite resin.
    Reis A; Higashi C; Loguercio AD
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(5):304-16. PubMed ID: 19796297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.