289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28267057)
1. Female pelvic floor biomechanics: bridging the gap.
Easley DC; Abramowitch SD; Moalli PA
Curr Opin Urol; 2017 May; 27(3):262-267. PubMed ID: 28267057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the pelvic organ prolapse: A parametric biomechanical modeling.
Babayi M; Azghani MR; Hajebrahimi S; Berghmans B
Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Feb; 38(2):591-598. PubMed ID: 30499117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What's new in the functional anatomy of pelvic organ prolapse?
DeLancey JO
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):420-9. PubMed ID: 27517338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. From molecular to macro: the key role of the apical ligaments in uterovaginal support.
Kieserman-Shmokler C; Swenson CW; Chen L; Desmond LM; Ashton-Miller JA; DeLancey JO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):427-436. PubMed ID: 31639371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Creation of the biomechanical finite element model of female pelvic floor supporting structure based on thin-sectional high-resolution anatomical images.
Xu Z; Chen N; Wang B; Yang J; Liu H; Zhang X; Li Y; Liu L; Wu Y
J Biomech; 2023 Jan; 146():111399. PubMed ID: 36509024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanics of Uterosacral Ligaments: Current Knowledge, Existing Gaps, and Future Directions.
Donaldson K; Huntington A; De Vita R
Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Aug; 49(8):1788-1804. PubMed ID: 33754254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recent Advances in Understanding Pelvic-Floor Tissue of Women With and Without Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Considerations for Physical Therapists.
Saunders K
Phys Ther; 2017 Apr; 97(4):455-463. PubMed ID: 28339839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor.
Ashton-Miller JA; DeLancey JO
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Apr; 1101():266-96. PubMed ID: 17416924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-dimensional biomechanical finite element modeling of the pelvic floor and prolapse.
Xue X; Wang H; Xie J; Gao Z; Shen J; Yao T
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2023 Aug; 22(4):1425-1446. PubMed ID: 37294482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Architecture of female urethral supporting structures based on undeformed high-resolution sectional anatomical images.
Li JR; Lei L; Luo N; Chen N; Xu HT; Xin Hu ; Song Y; Wu Y
Anat Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 96(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 32535854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical Analysis of the Uterosacral Ligament: Swine vs. Human.
Baah-Dwomoh A; Alperin M; Cook M; De Vita R
Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2036-2047. PubMed ID: 30051246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using the novel pelvic organ prolapse histologic quantification system to identify phenotypes in uterosacral ligaments in women with pelvic organ prolapse.
Orlicky DJ; Guess MK; Bales ES; Rascoff LG; Arruda JS; Hutchinson-Colas JA; Johnson J; Connell KA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 224(1):67.e1-67.e18. PubMed ID: 33130030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional modeling of the pelvic floor support systems of subjects with and without pelvic organ prolapse.
Ren S; Xie B; Wang J; Rong Q
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():845985. PubMed ID: 25710033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Tissue mechanics, animal models, and pelvic organ prolapse: a review.
Abramowitch SD; Feola A; Jallah Z; Moalli PA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 May; 144 Suppl 1():S146-58. PubMed ID: 19285776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
Lavelle ES; Giugale LE; Winger DG; Wang L; Carter-Brooks CM; Shepherd JP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Isolation and Characterization of the Murine Uterosacral Ligaments and Pelvic Floor Organs.
Bastías CS; Savard LM; Eckstein KN; Connell K; Luetkemeyer CM; Ferguson VL; Calve S
J Vis Exp; 2023 Mar; (193):. PubMed ID: 36939242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In-plane and out-of-plane deformations of gilt utero-sacral ligaments.
Donaldson K; Thomas J; Zhu Y; Clark-Deener S; Alperin M; De Vita R
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Jul; 131():105249. PubMed ID: 35526346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
