BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28267350)

  • 1. Variation in CT Number and Image Noise Uniformity According to Patient Positioning in MDCT.
    Szczykutowicz TP; DuPlissis A; Pickhardt PJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1064-1072. PubMed ID: 28267350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vertical off-centering affects organ dose in chest CT: Evidence from Monte Carlo simulations in anthropomorphic phantoms.
    Saltybaeva N; Alkadhi H
    Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5697-5704. PubMed ID: 28817195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT.
    Kaasalainen T; Palmu K; Reijonen V; Kortesniemi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 24951205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vertical Off-Centering in Reduced Dose Chest-CT: Impact on Effective Dose and Image Noise Values.
    Eberhard M; Blüthgen C; Barth BK; Frauenfelder T; Saltybaeva N; Martini K
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Apr; 27(4):508-517. PubMed ID: 31358357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of vertical positioning on organ dose, image noise and contrast in pediatric chest CT--phantom study.
    Kaasalainen T; Palmu K; Lampinen A; Kortesniemi M
    Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Jun; 43(6):673-84. PubMed ID: 23341090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of miscentering on patient dose and image noise in x-ray CT imaging: phantom and clinical studies.
    Habibzadeh MA; Ay MR; Asl AR; Ghadiri H; Zaidi H
    Phys Med; 2012 Jul; 28(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 21741870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How patient off-centering impacts organ dose and image noise in pediatric head and thoracoabdominal CT.
    Euler A; Saltybaeva N; Alkadhi H
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6790-6793. PubMed ID: 31278575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In-plane shielding for CT: effect of off-centering, automatic exposure control and shield-to-surface distance.
    Kalra MK; Dang P; Singh S; Saini S; Shepard JA
    Korean J Radiol; 2009; 10(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 19270862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. IMPLICATIONS OF PATIENT CENTRING ON ORGAN DOSE IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.
    Kataria B; Sandborg M; Althén JN
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):130-5. PubMed ID: 26743256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
    So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Organ dose and inherent uncertainty in helical CT dosimetry due to quasiperiodic dose distributions.
    Winslow JF; Tien CJ; Hintenlang DE
    Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3177-85. PubMed ID: 21815392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precise and Automatic Patient Positioning in Computed Tomography: Avatar Modeling of the Patient Surface Using a 3-Dimensional Camera.
    Saltybaeva N; Schmidt B; Wimmer A; Flohr T; Alkadhi H
    Invest Radiol; 2018 Nov; 53(11):641-646. PubMed ID: 29762259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of patient positioning when interpreting CT dose metrics: A phantom study.
    Marsh RM; Silosky MS
    Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1514-1524. PubMed ID: 28133763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current.
    Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6084-92. PubMed ID: 22047373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strategies for formulating appropriate MDCT techniques when imaging the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in pediatric patients.
    Cody DD; Moxley DM; Krugh KT; O'Daniel JC; Wagner LK; Eftekhari F
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Apr; 182(4):849-59. PubMed ID: 15039151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient Vertical Centering and Correlation with Radiation Output in Adult Abdominopelvic CT.
    Cheng PM
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Aug; 29(4):428-37. PubMed ID: 26810981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dosimetric impact of image artifact from a wide-bore CT scanner in radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Wu V; Podgorsak MB; Tran TA; Malhotra HK; Wang IZ
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4451-63. PubMed ID: 21859046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevalence and Severity of Off-Centering During Diagnostic CT: Observations From 57,621 CT scans of the Chest, Abdomen, and/or Pelvis.
    Akin-Akintayo OO; Alexander LF; Neill R; Krupinksi EA; Tang X; Mittal PK; Small WC; Moreno CC
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2019; 48(3):229-234. PubMed ID: 29576415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography: a phantom study.
    Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Damilakis J
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 23344518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.