418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28267477)
1. Comparison of diagnostic value using a small, single channel, P-wave centric sternal ECG monitoring patch with a standard 3-lead Holter system over 24 hours.
Smith WM; Riddell F; Madon M; Gleva MJ
Am Heart J; 2017 Mar; 185():67-73. PubMed ID: 28267477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring.
Barrett PM; Komatireddy R; Haaser S; Topol S; Sheard J; Encinas J; Fought AJ; Topol EJ
Am J Med; 2014 Jan; 127(1):95.e11-7. PubMed ID: 24384108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing 14-day adhesive patch with 24-h Holter monitoring.
Cheung CC; Kerr CR; Krahn AD
Future Cardiol; 2014 May; 10(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 24976467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Suspected cardiac syncope in elderly patients: use of the 12-lead electrocardiogram to select patients for holter monitoring.
Manchanda S; Ehsanullah M
Gerontology; 2001; 47(4):195-7. PubMed ID: 11408724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The quality of ECG data acquisition, and diagnostic performance of a novel adhesive patch for ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring in arrhythmia detection.
Karaoğuz MR; Yurtseven E; Aslan G; Deliormanlı BG; Adıgüzel Ö; Gönen M; Li KM; Yılmaz EN
J Electrocardiol; 2019; 54():28-35. PubMed ID: 30851474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Role of Holter Monitoring in the Diagnosis of Early Repolarisation Pattern.
Ji CC; Chen XM; Cheng YJ; Liu LJ; Tang K; Zhu WQ; Huang Y; Chen WY; Wu SH
Heart Lung Circ; 2018 Dec; 27(12):1421-1427. PubMed ID: 29129560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Novel Wearable Device for Continuous Ambulatory ECG Recording: Proof of Concept and Assessment of Signal Quality.
Steinberg C; Philippon F; Sanchez M; Fortier-Poisson P; O'Hara G; Molin F; Sarrazin JF; Nault I; Blier L; Roy K; Plourde B; Champagne J
Biosensors (Basel); 2019 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 30669678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of one- and three-lead ECG to measure cardiac intervals and differentiate drug-induced multi-channel block.
Brockway R; Brockway M; Brockway B; Hamlin R
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2018; 93():80-89. PubMed ID: 29704608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-Term Continuous Ambulatory ECG Monitors and External Cardiac Loop Recorders for Cardiac Arrhythmia: A Health Technology Assessment.
Health Quality Ontario
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2017; 17(1):1-56. PubMed ID: 28194254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ECG patch monitors for assessment of cardiac rhythm abnormalities.
Lobodzinski SS
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2013; 56(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 24215754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Usefulness of 24-h Holter monitoring in patients with unexplained syncope and a high likelihood of arrhythmias.
Sarasin FP; Carballo D; Slama S; Louis-Simonet M
Int J Cardiol; 2005 May; 101(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 15882664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of P wave Centric Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Monitoring in Infants and Young Children.
Romme AG; Umapathi KK; Nguyen HH
Pediatr Cardiol; 2021 Jun; 42(5):1126-1132. PubMed ID: 33837839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison Between a Single-Lead ECG Garment Device and a Holter Monitor: A Signal Quality Assessment.
Neri L; Corazza I; Oberdier MT; Lago J; Gallelli I; Cicero AFG; Diemberger I; Orro A; Beker A; Paolocci N; Halperin HR; Borghi C
J Med Syst; 2024 May; 48(1):57. PubMed ID: 38801649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incremental diagnostic yield of loop electrocardiographic recorders in unexplained syncope.
Linzer M; Pritchett EL; Pontinen M; McCarthy E; Divine GW
Am J Cardiol; 1990 Jul; 66(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 2371954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical value of ambulatory rhythm monitoring.
Chung EK
Cardiovasc Clin; 1980; 11(1):113-126. PubMed ID: 7438143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patch monitors for arrhythmia monitoring in patients for suspected inherited arrhythmia syndrome.
Cheung CC; Davies B; Gibbs K; Laksman ZW; Krahn AD
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):856-859. PubMed ID: 33512057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ambulatory Arrhythmia Detection with ZIO® XT Patch in Pediatric Patients: A Comparison of Devices.
Pradhan S; Robinson JA; Shivapour JK; Snyder CS
Pediatr Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 40(5):921-924. PubMed ID: 30937502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhanced detection of cardiac arrhythmias utilizing 14-day continuous ECG patch monitoring.
Liu CM; Chang SL; Yeh YH; Chung FP; Hu YF; Chou CC; Hung KC; Chang PC; Liao JN; Chan YH; Lo LW; Wu LS; Lin YJ; Wen MS; Chen SA
Int J Cardiol; 2021 Jun; 332():78-84. PubMed ID: 33727122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New holter monitoring analysis system: a calculation of the lead vectors.
Nanke T; Nakazawa K; Sakurai T; Matsumoto N; Kishi R; Takagi A; Sato C; Miyake F; Yamaki T; Kaneko M
Circ J; 2004 Aug; 68(8):751-6. PubMed ID: 15277734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the patient-activated event recording system vs. traditional 24 h Holter electrocardiography in individuals with paroxysmal palpitations or dizziness.
de Asmundis C; Conte G; Sieira J; Chierchia GB; Rodriguez-Manero M; Di Giovanni G; Ciconte G; Levinstein M; Baltogiannis G; Saitoh Y; Casado-Arroyo R; Brugada P
Europace; 2014 Aug; 16(8):1231-5. PubMed ID: 24574492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
