224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28267683)
1. Construct Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Assessment in Acute Care: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.
Chen HL; Cao YJ; Shen WQ; Zhu B
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2017 Feb; 63(2):38-41. PubMed ID: 28267683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. All at-risk patients are not created equal: analysis of Braden pressure ulcer risk scores to identify specific risks.
Tescher AN; Branda ME; Byrne TJ; Naessens JM
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 22552104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Midrange Braden Subscale Scores Are Associated With Increased Risk for Pressure Injury Development Among Critical Care Patients.
Alderden J; Cummins MR; Pepper GA; Whitney JD; Zhang Y; Butcher R; Thomas D
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2017; 44(5):420-428. PubMed ID: 28671894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pressure ulcer risk assessment: retrospective analysis of Braden Scale scores in Portuguese hospitalised adult patients.
Sardo P; Simões C; Alvarelhão J; Costa C; Simões CJ; Figueira J; Simões JL; Amado F; Amaro A; Melo E
J Clin Nurs; 2015 Nov; 24(21-22):3165-76. PubMed ID: 26316350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subscales, subscores, or summative score: evaluating the contribution of Braden Scale items for predicting pressure ulcer risk in older adults receiving home health care.
Bergquist S
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2001 Nov; 28(6):279-89. PubMed ID: 11707760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Mixed-methods Study to Assess Interrater Reliability and Nurse Perception of the Braden Scale in a Tertiary Acute Care Setting.
Ho CH; Cheung A; Southern D; Ocampo W; Kaufman J; Hogan DB; Baylis B; Conly JM; Stelfox HT; Ghali WA
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Dec; 62(12):30-38. PubMed ID: 28054924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
Kottner J; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity of the Braden Scale in grading pressure ulcers in trauma and burn patients.
Griswold LH; Griffin RL; Swain T; Kerby JD
J Surg Res; 2017 Nov; 219():151-157. PubMed ID: 29078875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence and a modification of the Braden Scale for a rehabilitation unit.
Schue RM; Langemo DK
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1998 Jan; 25(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 9481286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive power of the Braden scale for pressure sore risk in adult critical care patients: a comprehensive review.
Cox J
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(6):613-21; quiz 622-3. PubMed ID: 22948495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk assessment in a community hospital setting: the role of total score and individual subscale scores in triggering preventive interventions.
Gadd MM; Morris SM
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(6):535-8. PubMed ID: 25377103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale.
Jun Seongsook RN; Jeong Ihnsook RN; Lee Younghee RN
Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Feb; 41(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 14725784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison Study of Braden Scale and Time-to-Erythema Measures in Long-term Care.
Yap TL; Rapp MP; Kennerly S; Cron SG; Bergstrom N
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2015; 42(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 26336042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Retrospective Analysis of Pressure Ulcer Incidence and Modified Braden Scale Score Risk Classifications.
Chen HL; Cao YJ; Wang J; Huai BS
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2015 Sep; 61(9):26-30. PubMed ID: 26367479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity and reliability of the braden scale and the influence of other risk factors: a multi-centre prospective study.
Halfens RJ; Van Achterberg T; Bal RM
Int J Nurs Stud; 2000 Aug; 37(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 10760538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.
Chan WS; Pang SM; Kwong EW
J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1565-73. PubMed ID: 19490294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Braden scale (ALB) for assessing pressure ulcer risk in hospital patients: A validity and reliability study.
Chen HL; Cao YJ; Zhang W; Wang J; Huai BS
Appl Nurs Res; 2017 Feb; 33():169-174. PubMed ID: 28096013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the validity of the Braden scale using longitudinal electronic medical records.
Jin Y; Piao J; Lee SM
Res Nurs Health; 2015 Apr; 38(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 25556557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]