These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The concept of fitness in fluctuating environments. Sæther BE; Engen S Trends Ecol Evol; 2015 May; 30(5):273-81. PubMed ID: 25843273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence for r- and K-selection in a wild bird population: a reciprocal link between ecology and evolution. Sæther BE; Visser ME; Grøtan V; Engen S Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Apr; 283(1829):. PubMed ID: 27122550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genotypic Complexity of Fisher's Geometric Model. Hwang S; Park SC; Krug J Genetics; 2017 Jun; 206(2):1049-1079. PubMed ID: 28450460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The dynamics of adaptation on correlated fitness landscapes. Kryazhimskiy S; Tkacik G; Plotkin JB Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Nov; 106(44):18638-43. PubMed ID: 19858497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bigger Is Fitter? Quantitative Genetic Decomposition of Selection Reveals an Adaptive Evolutionary Decline of Body Mass in a Wild Rodent Population. Bonnet T; Wandeler P; Camenisch G; Postma E PLoS Biol; 2017 Jan; 15(1):e1002592. PubMed ID: 28125583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biophysical constraints determine the selection of phenotypic fluctuations during directed evolution. Shih HY; Mickalide H; Fraebel DT; Goldenfeld N; Kuehn S Phys Biol; 2018 Jul; 15(6):065003. PubMed ID: 29762139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A critical review of adaptive genetic variation in Atlantic salmon: implications for conservation. Garcia de Leaniz C; Fleming IA; Einum S; Verspoor E; Jordan WC; Consuegra S; Aubin-Horth N; Lajus D; Letcher BH; Youngson AF; Webb JH; Vøllestad LA; Villanueva B; Ferguson A; Quinn TP Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 May; 82(2):173-211. PubMed ID: 17437557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The temporal distribution of directional gradients under selection for an optimum. Chevin LM; Haller BC Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3381-94. PubMed ID: 25302419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Morphological evolution through complex domains of fitness. Niklas KJ Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1994 Jul; 91(15):6772-9. PubMed ID: 8041696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phenotypic noise and the cost of complexity. Rocabert C; Beslon G; Knibbe C; Bernard S Evolution; 2020 Oct; 74(10):2221-2237. PubMed ID: 32820537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Empirical fitness landscapes and the predictability of evolution. de Visser JA; Krug J Nat Rev Genet; 2014 Jul; 15(7):480-90. PubMed ID: 24913663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Appreciating the Multiple Processes Increasing Individual or Population Fitness. Edelaar P; Bolnick DI Trends Ecol Evol; 2019 May; 34(5):435-446. PubMed ID: 30850175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptive landscapes in evolving populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Melnyk AH; Kassen R Evolution; 2011 Nov; 65(11):3048-59. PubMed ID: 22023573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of the evolution of resistance to multiple antibiotics enables prediction of the Escherichia coli phenotype-based fitness landscape. Iwasawa J; Maeda T; Shibai A; Kotani H; Kawada M; Furusawa C PLoS Biol; 2022 Dec; 20(12):e3001920. PubMed ID: 36512529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Epistasis and the Structure of Fitness Landscapes: Are Experimental Fitness Landscapes Compatible with Fisher's Geometric Model? Blanquart F; Bataillon T Genetics; 2016 Jun; 203(2):847-62. PubMed ID: 27052568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the standardization of fitness and traits in comparative studies of phenotypic selection. De Lisle SP; Svensson EI Evolution; 2017 Oct; 71(10):2313-2326. PubMed ID: 28804878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]