152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28268752)
1. Design and optimization of PARTNER: a parallel actuated robotic trainer for NEuroRehabilitation.
Taheri H; Goodwin SA; Tigue JA; Perry JC; Wolbrecht ET
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():2128-2132. PubMed ID: 28268752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EMU: A transparent 3D robotic manipulandum for upper-limb rehabilitation.
Fong J; Crocher V; Tan Y; Oetomo D; Mareels I
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():771-776. PubMed ID: 28813913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exerciser for rehabilitation of the Arm (ERA): Development and unique features of a 3D end-effector robot.
Milot MH; Hamel M; Provost PO; Bernier-Ouellet J; Dupuis M; Letourneau D; Briere S; Michaud F
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5833-5836. PubMed ID: 28269581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modifying upper-limb inter-joint coordination in healthy subjects by training with a robotic exoskeleton.
Proietti T; Guigon E; Roby-Brami A; Jarrassé N
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 14(1):55. PubMed ID: 28606179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A review of technological and clinical aspects of robot-aided rehabilitation of upper-extremity after stroke.
Babaiasl M; Mahdioun SH; Jaryani P; Yazdani M
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 25600057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interaction force and motion estimators facilitating impedance control of the upper limb rehabilitation robot.
Mancisidor A; Zubizarreta A; Cabanes I; Bengoa P; Jung JH
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():561-566. PubMed ID: 28813879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of exercise training effect with different robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation: a retrospective study.
Colombo R; Pisano F; Delconte C; Mazzone A; Grioni G; Castagna M; Bazzini G; Imarisio C; Maggioni G; Pistarini C
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Apr; 53(2):240-248. PubMed ID: 27676203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance-based robotic assistance during rhythmic arm exercises.
Leconte P; Ronsse R
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Sep; 13(1):82. PubMed ID: 27623806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An overview of robotic/mechanical devices for post-stroke thumb rehabilitation.
Suarez-Escobar M; Rendon-Velez E
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Oct; 13(7):683-703. PubMed ID: 29334274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative Assessment of Motor Function for Patients with a Stroke by an End-Effector Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robot.
Liu Y; Song Q; Li C; Guan X; Ji L
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():5425741. PubMed ID: 32462001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feedforward model based arm weight compensation with the rehabilitation robot ARMin.
Just F; Ozen O; Tortora S; Riener R; Rauter G
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():72-77. PubMed ID: 28813796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic Modeling and Interactive Performance of PARM: A Parallel Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Robot Using Impedance Control for Patients after Stroke.
Guang H; Ji L; Shi Y; Misgeld BJE
J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():8647591. PubMed ID: 29850004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Upper limb robotics applied to neurorehabilitation: An overview of clinical practice.
Duret C; Mazzoleni S
NeuroRehabilitation; 2017; 41(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 28505985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combination of Exoskeletal Upper Limb Robot and Occupational Therapy Improve Activities of Daily Living Function in Acute Stroke Patients.
Iwamoto Y; Imura T; Suzukawa T; Fukuyama H; Ishii T; Taki S; Imada N; Shibukawa M; Inagawa T; Araki H; Araki O
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2019 Jul; 28(7):2018-2025. PubMed ID: 31047819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human arm joints reconstruction algorithm in rehabilitation therapies assisted by end-effector robotic devices.
Bertomeu-Motos A; Blanco A; Badesa FJ; Barios JA; Zollo L; Garcia-Aracil N
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Feb; 15(1):10. PubMed ID: 29458397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting Functional Recovery in Chronic Stroke Rehabilitation Using Event-Related Desynchronization-Synchronization during Robot-Assisted Movement.
Caimmi M; Visani E; Digiacomo F; Scano A; Chiavenna A; Gramigna C; Molinari Tosatti L; Franceschetti S; Molteni F; Panzica F
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():7051340. PubMed ID: 27057546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptive hybrid robotic system for rehabilitation of reaching movement after a brain injury: a usability study.
Resquín F; Gonzalez-Vargas J; Ibáñez J; Brunetti F; Dimbwadyo I; Carrasco L; Alves S; Gonzalez-Alted C; Gomez-Blanco A; Pons JL
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Oct; 14(1):104. PubMed ID: 29025427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability, validity and discriminant ability of the instrumental indices provided by a novel planar robotic device for upper limb rehabilitation.
Germanotta M; Cruciani A; Pecchioli C; Loreti S; Spedicato A; Meotti M; Mosca R; Speranza G; Cecchi F; Giannarelli G; Padua L; Aprile I
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 May; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 29769127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Review of Robotics in Neurorehabilitation: Towards an Automated Process for Upper Limb.
Oña ED; Cano-de la Cuerda R; Sánchez-Herrera P; Balaguer C; Jardón A
J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():9758939. PubMed ID: 29707189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving backdrivability in geared rehabilitation robots.
Nef T; Lum P
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Apr; 47(4):441-7. PubMed ID: 19184156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
