These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28269375)

  • 1. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in pharmacology: A plethysmographie solution in rats.
    Flenet T; Fontecave-Jallon J; Tanguy S; Boucher F; Baconnier P; Gumery PY
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():4933-4936. PubMed ID: 28269375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inductive plethysmography in rats: towards a new standard for longitudinal non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in preclinical studies.
    Fontecave-Jallon J; Flénet T; Eynard C; Guméry PY; Boucher F; Tanguy S
    Physiol Meas; 2018 Sep; 39(9):095006. PubMed ID: 30074905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emergency department non-invasive cardiac output study (EDNICO): a feasibility and repeatability study.
    McGregor D; Sharma S; Gupta S; Ahmad S; Godec T; Harris T
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2019 Mar; 27(1):30. PubMed ID: 30867006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring - To be or not to be, that is the question!
    Gupta A; Mishra S
    Indian Heart J; 2017; 69(3):293. PubMed ID: 28648415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2016 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.
    Saugel B; Bendjelid K; Critchley LA; Rex S; Scheeren TW
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Feb; 31(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 28064413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Continuous non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac index in infants and children: comparison of Impedance Cardiography NICaS® vs CardioQ® method.
    Beck R; Milella L; Labellarte C
    Clin Ter; 2018; 169(3):e110-e113. PubMed ID: 29938742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive monitoring.
    Monnet X; Teboul JL
    Crit Care Clin; 2015 Jan; 31(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 25435477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiac output monitoring in newborns.
    de Boode WP
    Early Hum Dev; 2010 Mar; 86(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 20171816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monitoring in resuscitation: comparison of cardiac output measurement between pulmonary artery catheter and NICO.
    Carretero MJ; Fontanals J; Agustí M; Arguis MJ; Martínez-Ocón J; Ruiz A; Rios J
    Resuscitation; 2010 Apr; 81(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 20083335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring.
    Magder S
    Crit Care Clin; 2015 Jan; 31(1):67-87. PubMed ID: 25435479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pressure Waveform Analysis.
    Jozwiak M; Monnet X; Teboul JL
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jun; 126(6):1930-1933. PubMed ID: 29077613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring for cesarean delivery under epidural anesthesia in a patient with Marfan syndrome and cardiomyopathy.
    Beaudry S; Pick J; Heerdt PM
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2016 Feb; 25():82-5. PubMed ID: 26718697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continuous non-invasive cardiac output monitoring during exercise: validation of electrical cardiometry with Fick and thermodilution methods.
    Liu YH; Dhakal BP; Keesakul C; Kacmarek RM; Lewis GD; Jiang Y
    Br J Anaesth; 2016 Jul; 117(1):129-31. PubMed ID: 27317712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiac output monitoring: Technology and choice.
    Kobe J; Mishra N; Arya VK; Al-Moustadi W; Nates W; Kumar B
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2019; 22(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 30648673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Equipment review: an appraisal of the LiDCO plus method of measuring cardiac output.
    Pearse RM; Ikram K; Barry J
    Crit Care; 2004 Jun; 8(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 15153237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clearsight™ use for haemodynamic monitoring during the third trimester of pregnancy - a validation study.
    Duclos G; Hili A; Resseguier N; Kelway C; Haddam M; Bourgoin A; Carcopino X; Zieleskiewicz L; Leone M
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2018 Nov; 36():85-95. PubMed ID: 30392653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Estimating cardiac output. Utility in the clinical practice. Available invasive and non-invasive monitoring].
    García X; Mateu L; Maynar J; Mercadal J; Ochagavía A; Ferrandiz A
    Med Intensiva; 2011 Dec; 35(9):552-61. PubMed ID: 21411188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Validation of Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Healthy Pregnant Women.
    McLaughlin K; Wright SP; Kingdom JCP; Parker JD
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Nov; 39(11):1008-1014. PubMed ID: 28733057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. At the threshold of noninvasive functional hemodynamic monitoring.
    Pinsky MR
    Anesthesiology; 2007 Jun; 106(6):1084-5. PubMed ID: 17525580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Hemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit: pulmonary artery catheter versus PiCCO].
    Gassanov N; Caglayan E; Nia A; Erdmann E; Er F
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2011 Feb; 136(8):376-80. PubMed ID: 21332037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.